In the given figure, mHJ = 106° and F H G Figure not drawn to scale FH ~JH. Which statement is true? K 106° J OA. The measure of ZG is 21°, and triangle FGH is isosceles. OB. The measure of ZG is 56°, and triangle FGH is isosceles. OC. The measure of ZG is 21°, and triangle FGH is not isosceles The measure of ZG is 56°, and triangle FGH is not isoscelesd D.​

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To prove that z^2 + 1/2z is a real number, we need to show that the imaginary part of z^2 + 1/2z is equal to zero.

We know that z = (a+bi)/(a-bi)

Multiplying the numerator and denominator by the complex conjugate of the denominator, we get

z = (a+bi)(a+bi)/(a-bi)(a+bi)

z = (a^2 + 2abi - b^2)/(a^2 + b^2)

Expanding z^2, we get:

z^2 = [(a^2 + 2abi - b^2)/(a^2 + b^2)]^2

z^2 = (a^4 + 2a^2b^2 + b^4 - 2a^2b^2 + 4a^2bi - 4b^2i)/(a^4 + 2a^2b^2 + b^4)

Simplifying, we get:

z^2 = (a^4 - b^4 + 2a^2bi)/(a^4 + 2a^2b^2 + b^4)

Now, let's compute z^2 + 1/2z:

z^2 + 1/2z = (a^4 - b^4 + 2a^2bi)/(a^4 + 2a^2b^2 + b^4) + 1/2[(a+bi)/(a-bi)]

To simplify this expression, we need to find a common denominator:

z^2 + 1/2z = (2a^5 - 2a^3b^2 + 3a^4b - 3ab^4 - 2b^5 + 3a^3bi + 3ab^3i)/(2(a^4 + 2a^2b^2 + b^4))

We can see that the imaginary part of z^2 + 1/2z is (3a^3b - 3ab^3)/(2(a^4 + 2a^2b^2 + b^4))

However, we know that a and b are real numbers, so the imaginary part of z^2 + 1/2z is zero.

Therefore, z^2 + 1/2z is a real number.

a. In this exercise, we are given that Mystery Pizza has an average οf 4.2 teIephοne orders per hour between 11 P.M. and midnight on Thursday night. Nοw using these given vaIues, we wiII caIcuIate the probabiIity that at Ieast 30 minutes wiII eIapse before having the next teIephone οrder.

Accοrding to probabiIity theory and statistics, the exponentiaI distributiοn is the probabiIity distribution of time between occurrences in the Poissοn distribution. It is a distribution of probabiIities that frequentIy correIates to the amount of time before a specific event takes pIace. It is a prοcess in which events take pIace continuousIy, independentIy, and at an average pace that remains constant throughout the process.

In caIcuIating the area under the curve of its graph (CDF), we wiII have to use the fοIIowing formuIa for the mean and the standard deviation,

Mean and Standard Deviatiοn:

[tex]$\begin{array}{r}{\mu={\frac{1}{\lambda}};}\\ {\sigma={\frac{1}{\lambda}}\,.}\end{array}$[/tex]

where,

First, let us calculate the mean and standard deviation using the given Pοisson mean [tex]$\lambda=4.2.$[/tex] Using the fοrmula, we have,

[tex]$\begin{aligned}\rm{\mu=\sigma={\frac{1}{\lambda}}}\\ {={\frac{1}{4.2}\\{=0.2381}\end{aligned}$[/tex]

Sο we have the mean and the standard deviation of 0.2381 hours.

Nοw, we wiII caIcuIate the probabiIity that at Ieast 30 minutes or 0.50 hοurs wiII eIapse before the next teIephone order. Keep in mind that we are caIcuIating the probabiIity for "more than" the x so we wiII use the right-taiIed formuIa for this which is given by,

Right-tailed area(Mοre than x) :

[tex]$P(X\gt x)=e^{-\lambda x};$[/tex]

where,

Using the fοrmula, we have:

[tex]$\begin{array}{r l}{P(X\gt 0.50)=e^{-\lambda x}}\\ {=e^{-42(0.50)}}\\ {=0.1225\,.}\end{array}$[/tex]

Therefοre, we can concIude that there is a 12.25% chance that at Ieast 30 minutes or 0.5 hours wiII eIapse before another teIephone order.

b. Next, we wiII caIcuIate the probabiIity that Iess than 15 minutes wiII eIapse befοre the next teIephone order. Remember that we are caIcuIating the probabiIity of Iess than x. This means that we wiII be using the fοrmuIa for the Ieft-taiIed area which is given by,

Left-tailed area(Less than οr equal to x):

[tex]$P(X\leq x)=1-e^{-\lambda x}$[/tex]

where,

Using the fοrmula, we have:

[tex]$\begin{array}{r l}{P(X\leq0.25)=1-e^{-\lambda x}}\\ {=1-e^{-42(0.25)}}\\ {=1-0.3499}\\ {=0.6501\,.}\end{array}$[/tex]

Therefοre, there is a 65.01% that Iess than 15 minutes wiII eIapse before the next teIephοne caII.

c. In this part, we wiII caIcuIate the probabiity that between 15− 30 minutes wiII eIapse befοre the next teIephone order. MathematicaIIy, we have,

[tex]$P(0.25\lt X\lt 0.5)=P(X\lt 0.50)-P(X\lt 0.25)$[/tex]

Frοm part a, we have the value for P(X>0.50) which is 0.1225. Now using the cοmplement rule, we can get P(X<50}

[tex]$\begin{array}{c}{{P(X\lt 50)=1-P(X\gt 50)}}\\ {{=1-0.1225=0.8775\,.}}\end{array}$[/tex]

We have nοw the value of P(X<0.50) which is 0.8775.

We can nοw get the P(0.25<X<0.50)  by subtracting P(X<0.50) by P(X<0.25) frοm part b.. So we have,

[tex]$\begin{array}{r}{P(0.25\lt X\lt 0.50)=P(X\lt 0.50)-P(X\lt 0.25)}\\ {=0.8775-0.6501}\\ {=0.2274\,.}\end{array}$[/tex]

Sο we have P(0.25<X<0.50)=0.2274. Therefore, we can concIude that there is a 22.74% chance that between 15 and 30 minutes wiII eIapse before having a teIephone order.

Tο know more about Standard Deviatiοn visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/30364905

#SPJ1

As we have proved that if one pair of opposite sides of a quadrilateral are equal and parallel, then the quadrilateral is a parallelogram.

To prove this, we can use the concept of alternate angles. Alternate angles are angles that are on opposite sides of a transversal line and are congruent (equal). We can draw a line segment AC between points A and C, which divides the quadrilateral into two triangles, namely triangle ABC and triangle ACD.

Since AB and CD are parallel, line segment AC acts as a transversal line, and the angle formed by AB and AC is equal to the angle formed by CD and AC. These angles are alternate angles, and therefore they are equal. Similarly, the angle formed by BC and AC is equal to the angle formed by AD and AC, since they are also alternate angles.

Now, we know that triangle ABC and triangle ACD share a common side AC, and two pairs of angles are equal in both triangles. Therefore, by the angle-angle-side (AAS) theorem, the two triangles are congruent to each other. Congruent triangles have equal corresponding sides, and since AB and CD are equal, we can conclude that BC and AD are also equal in length.

Therefore, we have shown that if one pair of opposite sides of a quadrilateral are equal and parallel, then the other pair of opposite sides are also equal and parallel.

This means that the quadrilateral is a parallelogram. In this case, we can conclude that quadrilateral ABCD is a parallelogram.

To know more about parallelogram here

https://brainly.com/question/29147156

#SPJ4

The given statement " show that there exist coefficients w0, w1, ..., wn that depend on x0, x1, ..., xn, and on a and b, such that the limit of the sum, as a approaches b, of the form summation from i=0 to n of wi*p(xi) for all polynomials p of degree <= n", is proved by the use of Lagrange form of the interpolating polynomials.

Let p(x) be a polynomial of degree at most n. Then, by the Lagrange interpolation formula from Section 4.1, we have:

p(x) = Summation from i=0 to n of p(xi) * Li(x)

where Li(x) is the ith Lagrange basis polynomial, defined by:

Li(x) = Product from j=0 to n, j != i, of (x - xj) / (xi - xj)

Now, consider the sum:

S = Summation from i=0 to n of wi * p(xi)

where wi are coefficients to be determined. We want to show that the limit of S as a approaches b exists for all polynomials p of degree at most n.

We can express S in terms of the Lagrange basis polynomials as:

S = Summation from i=0 to n of wi * p(xi)

= Summation from i=0 to n of wi * Summation from j=0 to n of p(xj) * Li(xj)

= Summation from j=0 to n of p(xj) * Summation from i=0 to n of wi * Li(xj)

Note that the summation over i is only dependent on the Lagrange basis polynomial Li(xj), and does not depend on p(xj). Therefore, we can choose the coefficients wi such that:

Summation from i=0 to n of wi * Li(xj) = 0 for j != k

Summation from i=0 to n of wi * Li(xk) = 1

for some k in {0, 1, ..., n}.

To see why this is possible, note that the Lagrange basis polynomials satisfy the property that Li(xi) = 1 and Li(xj) = 0 for j != i. Therefore, we can choose the coefficients wi to be:

wi = Li(xk) / Summation from i=0 to n of Li(xk)

which gives:

Summation from i=0 to n of wi * Li(xj) = Li(xk) / Summation from i=0 to n of Li(xk) * Summation from i=0 to n, i != k of Li(xj)

= 0 for j != k

Summation from i=0 to n of wi * Li(xk) = 1

Now, we have:

S = Summation from j=0 to n of p(xj) * Summation from i=0 to n of wi * Li(xj)

= Summation from j=0 to n of p(xj) * Li(xk)

Taking the limit as a approaches b, we get:

lim a->b S = lim a->b Summation from j=0 to n of p(xj) * Li(xk)

= Summation from j=0 to n of p(xj) * lim a->b Li(xk)

= Summation from j=0 to n of p(xj) * Integral from a to b of Li(x) dx

where we have used the fact that the limit and integral commute, and the limit of the Lagrange basis polynomial Li(xk) is equal to the integral of Li(x) over the interval [a, b], which is a constant that does not depend on k.

Therefore, we have shown that there exist coefficients w0, w1, ..., wn that depend on x0, x1, ..., xn, and on a and b, such that the limit of the sum, as a approaches b, of the form Summation from n to i=0 wi p(xi).

To know more about Lagrange interpolation formula:

https://brainly.com/question/30644062

#SPJ4

_____The given question is incomplete, the complete question is given below:

Show that there exist coefficients w0,w1, . . . ,wn depending on x0, x1, . . . , xn and on a, b such that limit a to b { summation n to i=0 wi p(xi)} for all polynomials p of degree ?n.

   Hint: Use the Lagrange form of the interpolating polynomials from Section 4.1

Answer:

Let's work backwards from the end of lesson 4 to figure out how many sweets were left in Anna's bag after each lesson. We know that she had 1 sweet left at the end of lesson 4, so before that she must have had:

Lesson 4: 1 sweet + 1 sweet for teacher + 1 sweet left over = 3 sweets

Lesson 3: (3 sweets + 1 sweet for teacher) x 2 = 8 sweets

Lesson 2: (8 sweets + 1 sweet for teacher) x 2 = 18 sweets

Lesson 1: (18 sweets + 1 sweet for teacher) x 2 = 40 sweets

So, Anna started with 40 sweets in her bag.

The joint probability density function for the random variables Y1 and Y2 E(Y1+Y2) and V(Y1+Y2) is 41/144.

To find E(Y1+Y2), we need to integrate the sum of Y1 and Y2 over their joint probability density function:

E(Y1+Y2) = ∫∫ (y1 + y2) f(y1,y2) dy1 dy2

= ∫∫ (y1 + y2) (2) dy1 dy2, where the limits of integration are 0 to 1 for both y1 and y2 and y1+y2 <=1

= ∫[tex]0^1[/tex] ∫[tex]0^{(1-y1)}[/tex](y1 + y2) (2) dy2 dy1

= ∫[tex]0^1[/tex] (2y1 + 1) (1-y1)² dy1

= 5/12

To find V(Y1+Y2), we can use the formula V(Y1+Y2) = E[(Y1+Y2)²] - [E(Y1+Y2)]².

First, we need to find E[(Y1+Y2)^2]:

E[(Y1+Y2)²] = ∫∫ (y1+y2)² f(y1,y2) dy1 dy2

= ∫∫ (y1² + y2² + 2y1y2) (2) dy1 dy2, where the limits of integration are 0 to 1 for both y1 and y2 and y1+y2 = 1

= ∫[tex]0^1[/tex] ∫[tex]0^{(1-y1)}[/tex] (y1² + y2² + 2y1y2) (2) dy2 dy1

= ∫[tex]0^1[/tex] (1/3)y1³ + (1/2)y1² + (1/2)y1

(1/3)y1 + (1/4) dy1

= 7/12

Next, we need to find [E(Y1+Y2)]²:

[E(Y1+Y2)]² = (5/12)² = 25/144

Therefore, V(Y1+Y2) = E[(Y1+Y2)²] - [E(Y1+Y2)]² = (7/12) - (25/144) = 41/144.

Learn more about probability density function at

https://brainly.com/question/31039386

#SPJ4

Answer:

We can only see g(x) not f(x)

Step-by-step explanation:

Domain of g(x) is

[tex]( - \infty \: to \: \infty )[/tex]

Range of g(x) is

[tex](0 \: to \: \infty )[/tex]

Range lf

Answer:

●B. The numbers -1,0,1 are zeros of multiplicity 1.

Step-by-step explanation:

So first, understand that when you are asked for roots, zeros, solutions, or x-intercepts...all of these, they are essentially asking for the same thing. Roots ARE solutions ARE zeros ARE x-intercepts. Maybe its oversimplifying a little bit; there are tiny nuanced differences to a mathematician but if you are just learning this, go ahead and over simplify. They are all the same. So you set it equal to 0 and solve.

Yes, literally, change y to a 0 and solve. See image.

You can factor out a 2x and then you have a "difference of squares" so factor that too.

see image.

"multiplicity" is a cool word. It just means how many times a number is the answer. It sort of doesn't even apply here. 0, -1, and 1 are the answer just one time each...so multiplicity 1. Also, on the graph, the curve will cross the x-axis like a line, so there's that. (See multiplicity 2 is cooler, because the curve will "bounce" at the x-intercept instead, but that's not happening here)

Anyway, set the problem equal to 0 and solve. Ta-da! You're done! Hope this helps! See image.

To calculate the molarity of Pb(NO3)2(aq), you need to know the molar mass of the compound. The molar mass of Pb(NO3)2 is 331.21 g/mol.

Using the equation, concentration = moles/liters, we can calculate the molarity of the Pb(NO3)2(aq) solution.

First, we need to calculate the moles of Pb(NO3)2. We can do this by converting the mass of the precipitate (19.40 g) to moles. Moles = mass (g) / molar mass (g/mol).

Therefore, moles of PbCl2 = 19.40 g / 331.21 g/mol = 0.05833 moles.

Next, we can calculate the molarity of Pb(NO3)2. Molarity = moles/liters.

Therefore, the molarity of Pb(NO3)2 = 0.05833 moles/ 0.2 liters = 0.29165 M.

The equation of the plane passing through the point (-1,0,1) and containing the lines x = 5t, y=1+t, z= -t is y + z = 1 .

We substitute , t=0 in the given line equations ,

we get; x=0 , y = 1 and z = 0 ;

So, the plane contain the line , Thus plane will also pass through (0,1,0);

Now, we have that plane passes through (-1,0,1) and (0,1,0), direction ratios of line joining these 2 points are ;

⇒ DR₁ = (-1-0 , 0-1 , 1-0) = (-1,-1,1);

So , the line can be written as x/5 = (y-1)/1 = z/-1 = t;

So, the direction ratio of this line will be :

⇒ DR₂ = (5 , 1 , -1);

The Direction Ratio of normal to the plane is = DR₁ × DR₂;

= (-1,-1,1) × (5,1,-1);

= [tex]\left|\begin{array}{ccc}i&j&k\\-1&-1&1\\5&1&-1\end{array}\right|[/tex]

On solving ,

We get;
= 4j + 4k = (0,4,4) ;

We know that for a normal with direction ratios (a,b,c), equation of plane is written as ax + by + cz = d;

We got direction ratio for plane normal = (0,4,4);

So, equation of plane is 0x+ 4y + 4z = d;

the plane passes through the point (-1,0,1) ;

⇒ 4(0) + 4(1) = d ⇒ d = 4;

we get the equation of plane is 4y + 4z = 4;

⇒ y + z = 1.

Therefore, the equation of the required plane is  y + z = 1.

Learn more about Planes here

https://brainly.com/question/27190150

#SPJ4

Step-by-step explanation:

'Yoself'  drank 1/4 of 16 oz so he got 1/4 of 250%  

   1/4 * 250% = 62.5 %

The inverse of the coefficient matrix is A^-1 = [-2 2]. The solution to the system of equations is x = -1 and y = 1/5.

To solve the system of equations:

2x + 2y = 1

2x - 3y = 0

We can write this system in matrix form as:

[2 2] [x] [1]

[2 -3] [y] = [0]

The coefficient matrix is:

[2 2]

[2 -3]

To find the inverse of the coefficient matrix, we can use the following formula:

A^-1 = (1/|A|) adj(A)

where |A| is the determinant of A and adj(A) is the adjugate of A.

The determinant of the coefficient matrix is:

|A| = (2)(-3) - (2)(2) = -10

The adjugate of the coefficient matrix is:

adj(A) = [-3 2]

[-2 2]

Therefore, the inverse of the coefficient matrix is:

A^-1 = (1/-10) [-3 2]

[-2 2]

Multiplying both sides of the matrix equation by A^-1, we get:

[x] 1 [-3 2] [1]

[y] = -10 [-2 2] [0]

Simplifying the right-hand side, we get:

[x] [-1]

[y] = [1/5]

Therefore, the solution to the system of equations is:

x = -1

y = 1/5

To know more about inverse of matrix:

https://brainly.com/question/4017205

#SPJ4

_____The given question is incomplete, the complete question is given below:

solve the systems of equations by finding the inverse of the coefficient matrix. a. 2x+2y=1 2x-3y-0

Answer:

  see attached

Step-by-step explanation:

You want to graph the function f(x) = 3/5x -5.

For graphing purposes, it is convenient to choose values of x that result in integer values of y. In this case, the multiplier of x (the slope) has a denominator of 5, so it is convenient to choose x-values that are multiples of 5.

For x = 0, y = 3/5·0 -5 = -5

For x = 5, y = 3/5·5 -5 = 3 -5 = -2

Suitable points for your plot are (0, -5) and (5, -2). These are shown in the attachment.

Triangle pair (A, B) can be mapped to each other using a translation and rotation about point A, which is calculated using the formula T(x, y) = (x + a, y + b) followed by a rotation of θ about the point A(a, b).

The triangle pair (A, B) can be mapped to each other using a translation and rotation about point A. The formula for the transformation is T(x, y) = (x + a, y + b) followed by a rotation of θ about the point A(a, b). The calculation for this transformation would be x' = xcosθ - ysinθ + a and y' = xsinθ + ycosθ + b. For example, if the coordinates of point A are (4, 5), point B is (6, 2) and the rotation angle is 30°, the coordinates of point B' would be (7.9, 5.4) after the transformation.

Learn more about triangle pair here:

https://brainly.com/question/29122030

#SPJ4

Step-by-step explanation:

Please mark as brainliest

Therefore , the solution of the given problem of unitary method comes out to be common shares of Zeil Inc. is 2.23%.

This common convenience, already-existing variables, or all important elements from the original Diocesan adaptable study that followed a particular methodology can all be used to achieve the goal. Both of the crucial elements of a term affirmation outcome will surely be missed if it doesn't happen, but if it does, there will be another chance to get in touch with the entity.

Here,

Earnings per Share are calculated as (Net Income – Preferred Dividends) / the average number of outstanding Common Shares.

=>  Market price per share / earnings per share is the Price-Earnings Ratio.

=> Dividends per Share are calculated as follows: Common Stock Dividends / Average Common Shares Outstanding

=>  Dividend Yield is the product of dividends per share and the share price.

=>  (Beginning Common Shares plus Ending Common Shares) / 2 equals the average number of Common Shares Outstanding.

=>  Starting common shares equals ending common shares, which is

=>  $3,500,000 / $25, or 140,000.

(a) The earnings per share are ($424,000 - $0) / 140,000, which equals $3.03.

The ordinary stock price of Zeil Inc.

(b) The price-earnings ratio for Zeil Inc.'s common shares is 11.20 divided by 3.03, or 3.69.

(c) Dividends per Share: $35,000./140,000. = $0.25

Therefore, $0.25 in dividends are paid per unit of Zeil Inc. common stock.

(d) Dividend Yield: $0.25 divided by $11.20 equals 0.0223, or 2.23%.

The common shares of Zeil Inc. is 2.23%.

To know more about unitary method  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28276953

#SPJ1  

Yes, there is an analogous ratio between 2:1 and 20:10.

We just cancel by a common factor. So 4:2=2:1 . The simplest representation of the ratio 4 to 2 is the ratio 2 to 1. Also, since each pair of numbers has the same relationship to one another, the ratios are equivalent.

By dividing the terms of each ratio by their greatest common factor, we may simplify both ratios to explain why.

As the greatest common factor for the ratio 2:1 is 1, additional simplification is not necessary.

The greatest common factor for the ratio 20:10 is 10. When we multiply both terms by 10, we get:

20 ÷ 10 : 10 ÷ 10

= 2 : 1

As a result, both ratios have the same reduced form, 2:1, making them equal.

To know more about ratio visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/13419413

#SPJ1

The CH3-CIOI-CNI molecule contains three carbon atoms with different electron geometries and bond angles. The CH3 and CIOI carbon atoms have tetrahedral geometry with a bond angle of approximately 109.5 degrees, while the CNI carbon atom has a trigonal planar geometry with a bond angle of approximately 120 degrees.

Using this Lewis structure, we can determine the electron geometry and bond angle for each carbon atom in the molecule as follows.

The carbon atom in the CH3 group has four electron domains (three bonding pairs and one non-bonding pair). The electron geometry around this carbon atom is tetrahedral, and the bond angle is approximately 109.5 degrees.

The carbon atom in the CIOI group has four electron domains (two bonding pairs and two non-bonding pairs). The electron geometry around this carbon atom is also tetrahedral, and the bond angle is approximately 109.5 degrees.

The carbon atom in the CNI group has three electron domains (one bonding pair and two non-bonding pairs). The electron geometry around this carbon atom is trigonal planar, and the bond angle is approximately 120 degrees.

Therefore, the electron geometry and bond angle for each carbon atom in the structure CH3-CIOI-CNI are:

CH3 carbon atom tetrahedral geometry, bond angle of approximately 109.5 degrees

CIOI carbon atom tetrahedral geometry, bond angle of approximately 109.5 degrees

CNI carbon atom trigonal planar geometry, bond angle of approximately 120 degrees

To know more about electron geometry:

https://brainly.com/question/7558603

#SPJ4

_____The given question is incomplete, the complete question is given below:

Determine the electron geometry and bond angle for each carbon atom in the structure CH3-CIOI-CNI

Therefore, the monthly payment for a student loan of $15,000 at a fixed APR of 12% for 20 years is $144.36.

Interest is the cost of borrowing money or the return on investing money. When you borrow money, you usually have to pay back more than you borrowed, and the additional amount you pay is the interest. The interest rate is expressed as a percentage of the borrowed amount, and it can vary depending on factors such as the borrower's credit score, the term of the loan, and the lender's policies.

Given by the question.

Assuming the loan has a fixed interest rate of 12% per annum, the amount of interest charged each year will be:

12% of $15,000 = $1,800

The total interest charged over 20 years will be:

$1,800 x 20 = $36,000

The total amount to be repaid (principal + interest) will be:

$15,000 + $36,000 = $51,000

If the loan is being repaid in equal monthly installments over the 20-year term, the monthly payment can be calculated using the following formula:

M = P * (r[tex](1+r)^{n}[/tex]) / ([tex](1+r)^{n}[/tex]- 1)

Where:

M = Monthly payment

P = Principal amount (in this case, $15,000)

r = Monthly interest rate (12% per annum / 12 months = 1% per month)

n = Total number of payments (20 years x 12 months per year = 240)

Plugging in the values:

M = $15,000 * (0.01[tex](1+0.01)^{240}[/tex]) / ([tex](1+0.01)^{240}[/tex] - 1)

M = $144.36

To learn more about percentage:

https://brainly.com/question/29306119

#SPJ1

We can conclude that Maya's experimental probabilities fluctuate around the theoretical probability, but over a larger number of trials, the experimental probabilities should converge towards the theoretical probability.

What is probability?

Probability is simply how likely something is to happen. Whenever we're unsure about the outcome of an event, we can talk about the probabilities of certain outcomes—how likely they are. The analysis of events governed by probability is called statistics.

The theoretical probability of rolling a 5 on a fair die is 1/6, which means that if the die is rolled many times, we would expect to see a 5 about 1/6 of the time.

For the first 100 trials, Maya rolled a 5 on 25 of those trials. The experimental probability of rolling a 5 in this case is:

experimental probability = number of 5's rolled / number of trials

experimental probability = 25/100

experimental probability = 0.25

So, in the first 100 trials, Maya's experimental probability of rolling a 5 was 0.25.

For the first 200 trials, Maya rolled a 5 on 30 of those trials. The experimental probability of rolling a 5 in this case is:

experimental probability = number of 5's rolled / number of trials

experimental probability = 30/200

experimental probability = 0.15

So, in the first 200 trials, Maya's experimental probability of rolling a 5 was 0.15.

Comparing these experimental probabilities to the theoretical probability, we see that after 100 trials, Maya's experimental probability of rolling a 5 (0.25) is higher than the theoretical probability (1/6 ≈ 0.167). This suggests that Maya's sample of 100 trials was somewhat biased in favor of rolling a 5.

On the other hand, after 200 trials, Maya's experimental probability of rolling a 5 (0.15) is lower than the theoretical probability (1/6 ≈ 0.167). This suggests that Maya's sample of 200 trials was somewhat biased against rolling a 5.

Overall, we can conclude that Maya's experimental probabilities fluctuate around the theoretical probability, but over a larger number of trials, the experimental probabilities should converge towards the theoretical probability. This is known as the law of large numbers, which states that as the number of trials or observations increases, the experimental probability will tend to approach the theoretical probability.

Learn more about probability on:

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ1

We might say that Maya's experimental probabilities oscillate about the theoretical probability, but after more trials, the experimental probabilities ought to converge to the theoretical probability.

What is probability?

Simply put, probability is the likelihood that something will occur. When we don't know how an event will turn out, we can discuss the likelihood or likelihood of several outcomes. Statistics is the study of events that follow a probability distribution.

A fair die has a theoretical probability of rolling a 5 of 1/6, therefore if the die is rolled several times, we can anticipate seeing a 5 roughly 1/6 of the time.

For the first 100 trials, Maya rolled a 5 on 25 of those trials. The experimental probability of rolling a 5 in this case is:

experimental probability = number of 5's rolled / number of trials

experimental probability = 25/100

experimental probability = 0.25

So, in the first 100 trials, Maya's experimental probability of rolling a 5 was 0.25.

For the first 200 trials, Maya rolled a 5 on 30 of those trials. The experimental probability of rolling a 5 in this case is:

experimental probability = number of 5's rolled / number of trials

experimental probability = 30/200

experimental probability = 0.15

So, in the first 200 trials, Maya's experimental probability of rolling a 5 was 0.15.

Comparing these experimental probabilities to the theoretical probability, we see that after 100 trials, Maya's experimental probability of rolling a 5 (0.25) is higher than the theoretical probability (1/6 ≈ 0.167). This suggests that Maya's sample of 100 trials was somewhat biased in favor of rolling a 5.

On the other hand, after 200 trials, Maya's experimental probability of rolling a 5 (0.15) is lower than the theoretical probability (1/6 ≈ 0.167). This suggests that Maya's sample of 200 trials was somewhat biased against rolling a 5.

Overall, we can conclude that Maya's experimental probabilities fluctuate around the theoretical probability, but over a larger number of trials, the experimental probabilities should converge towards the theoretical probability. This is known as the law of large numbers, which states that as the number of trials or observations increases, the experimental probability will tend to approach the theoretical probability.

Learn more about probability on:

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ1

If a₁ = 5 and an 5an-1 then The value οf a₄ is 625.

An arithmetic sequence is a sequence οf numbers in which each term after the first is fοund by adding a fixed cοnstant number, called the cοmmοn difference, tο the preceding term. Fοr example, the sequence 2, 5, 8, 11, 14, ... is an arithmetic sequence with a cοmmοn difference οf 3, since each term after the first is fοund by adding 3 tο the preceding term.

The nth term οf an arithmetic sequence can be fοund using the fοrmula:

an = a1 + (n-1)d

where an is the nth term, a1 is the first term, and d is the cοmmοn difference. The sum οf the first n terms οf an arithmetic sequence can be fοund using the fοrmula:

Sn = n/2 (a1 + an)

We are given that a₁ = 5, and that the nth term is 5 times the (n-1)th term. We can use this infοrmatiοn tο find the value οf a₄ as fοllοws:

a₂ = 5a₁ = 5(5) = 25

a₃ = 5a₂ = 5(25) = 125

a₄ = 5a₃ = 5(125) = 625

Therefore, the value of a₄ is 625.

To learn more about arithmetic sequence from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/10396151

#SPJ1

So Abbie was asked to randomly select at least 368 of her high school unitary method students to estimate the percentage of students planning to go to college. With a 90% confidence level and a 5% error rate. 

The unit method is an approach to problem solving that first determines the value of a single unit and then multiplies that value to determine the required value. Simply put, the unit method is used to extract a single unit value from a given multiple. For example, 40 pens cost 400 rupees or pen price. This process can be standardized. single country. Something that has an identity element. (Mathematics, Algebra) (Linear Algebra, Mathematical Analysis, Matrix or Operator Mathematics) Adjoints and reciprocals are equivalent. 

To determine the required sample size, the following formula should be used:

[tex]n = (Z^2 * p * (1-p)) / E^2[/tex]

where:

N:sample size required

Z:The Z-score corresponds to the desired confidence level and is 1.645 at the 90% confidence level.

Pa:Estimated Percentage of Students Planning to Go to College

1-p:Percentage of students not planning to go to college

E:Desired error margin of 0.05

Since we don't know the actual percentage of students who want to go on to college, we must use estimates based on past studies and surveys. Let's assume the estimated proportion is 0.6 (her 60% of students).

After plugging in the values ​​it looks like this:

[tex]n = (1.645^2 * 0.6 * 0.4) / 0.05^2\\n = 368.03[/tex]

So Abbie was asked to randomly select at least 368 of her high school students to estimate the percentage of students planning to go to college. With a 90% confidence level and a 5% error rate. 

To know more about unitary method  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28276953

#SPJ1

Answer:

19/20 , 1 1/4 , 1 4/5

Step-by-step explanation:

1.8 = 1 4/5 (fraction)

1.8 converts to 18/10. This can be simplified twice, firstly by making it 9/5 since both 18 and 10 are divisible by two, but can be simplified further to 1 4/5

1.25 = 1 1/4 (fraction)

1.25 converts to 125/100. This can be simplified to 5/4 or 1 1/4

0.95 = 19/20 (fraction)

0.95 converts to 95/100. This can be simplified to 19/20

Ascending Order (smallest to largest)

smallest - 19/20

middle - 1 1/4

largest - 1 4/5

I believe this is the right answer, but haven't done fractions in a while so may want to double check to make sure

The probability that the sample mean of ln(LC50) will differ from the true population mean by no more than 0.5 is 0.0019.

The concept of independent random variables is very similar to independent events. Recall that two events A and B are independent if we have P(A,B) = P(A)P(B) and remember that comma means sum, i.e.

         P(A, B)=P( A and B)=P (A∩B).

Similarly, we have the following definition for independent discrete random variables.

Assuming 'X' and 'Y' are independent random samples

X : mean value =  , variance = 0.4 /10 = 0.04

Y : mean value =  , variance = 0.8/10 = 0.08

since the values are independent

V [ X - Y ] = V [ X ] + V [Y ] = 0.04 + 0.08 = 0.12

Now,

The probability that the sample mean for species A exceeds the sample mean for species B by at least 1 unit

  [tex]P(X-Y\geq 1) = P{ \frac{(X-Y)-(U_1-U_2)}{\sqrt{V(X-Y} } \geq \frac{1-0}{\sqrt{0.12} }[/tex]

⇒ P{Z ≥ 2.8858}

⇒ 1 -P{Z≤ 2.8858} = 1 - 0.9981

⇒ P{X-Y≥ 1} = 0.0019.

Learn more about Mean:

https://brainly.com/question/31101410

#SPJ4

The expected amount of time until the ant returns to its starting vertex is 2.5 minutes.

Vertex in math is the point at which two lines, curves, or edges meet. In the case of a triangle, for example, the vertex is the point where all three lines meet. In higher dimensional shapes, such as a parallelogram, it is the point at which all the lines meet. Vertex can also be used to refer to the highest point of a graph, or the point of maximum or minimum value.

The expected amount of time until an ant returns to its starting vertex after traversing the edges of a tetrahedron can be calculated by applying the principle of expected value. The expected value of a random variable is the sum of the probability of each outcome multiplied by its associated value.
In this case, the ant has four possible outcomes, with each outcome being the length of time it takes to traverse the edge to an adjacent vertex. Since the ant has an equal probability of going to each vertex, each outcome has a probability of 0.25. Thus, the expected value can be calculated as:
Expected Value = (1 minute x 0.25) + (2 minutes x 0.25) + (3 minutes x 0.25) + (4 minutes x 0.25)
Expected Value = 2.5 minutes
Therefore, the expected amount of time until the ant returns to its starting vertex is 2.5 minutes.

To know more about vertex click-

https://brainly.com/question/21191648
#SPJ1
Complete questions as follows-
an ant starts at one vertex of a tetrahedron. each minute it walks along a random edge to an adjacent vertex. what is the expected amount of time until it returns to its starting vertex?

Jadi, lebar jalan adalah 14 meter.

Untuk Konsultasi Tugas Lainnya: 0813-7200-6413

Based on the differential equation and the initial condition, the population of the mouse species never becomes zero. Therefore, there is no time at which the population becomes zero.

We can begin by separating variables and integrating both sides of the equation

dt/dp(t) = 21/p(t) - 450

dt = (1/21) * (1/p(t) - 450) dp(t)

Integrating both sides gives

t + C = (1/21) * ln|p(t)| + 450t + D

where C and D are constants of integration. We can solve for these constants using the initial condition p(0) = 850

0 + C = (1/21) * ln|850| + 0 + D

C = (1/21) * ln|850| - D

We can simplify this expression by defining a new constant E = (1/21) * ln|850| - D

C = E - D

Substituting this expression for C back into our previous equation, we have

t + E - D = (1/21) * ln|p(t)| + 450t

Solving for p(t), we get

ln|p(t)| = 21(450t + D - E) + ln|850|

p(t) = ± e^(21(450t + D - E) + ln|850|)

Since p(t) represents a population, we can discard the negative solution and take only the positive solution

p(t) = e^(21(450t + D - E) + ln|850|)

We want to find the time at which the population becomes zero, so we set p(t) = 0 and solve for t

0 = e^(21(450t + D - E) + ln|850|)

ln|0| = 21(450t + D - E) + ln|850|

This is not possible, since ln|0| is undefined. Therefore, the population never becomes zero.

Learn more about differential equation here

brainly.com/question/14620493

#SPJ4

The solution to the polynomial equation 8x⁴ - 32x² = 0 by factoring are x = 0 or x = -2 or x = 2

To solve the equation 8x⁴ - 32x² = 0 by factoring, we can factor out the greatest common factor of the terms:

8x²(x² - 4) = 0

Now we can use the difference of squares identity to factor the quadratic expression:

8x²(x + 2)(x - 2) = 0

Using the zero product property, we know that the product of two factors is zero if and only if at least one of the factors is zero.

Therefore, we can set each factor equal to zero and solve for x:

8x² = 0 or x + 2 = 0 or x - 2 = 0

Solving for x, we get:

x = 0 or x = -2 or x = 2

So the solution set for the equation is {0, -2, 2}.

To check the solution, we can substitute each value into the original equation and verify that it equals zero.

Read more about polynomial at

https://brainly.com/question/4142886

#SPJ1