Characteristics of visible​

Answer:

an apostrophe

Explanation:

Answer:

An apostrophe

Explanation:

the apostrophe goes where the letters were removed in a contraction like don't (do + not) remove the no and add an apostrophe.

Answer:

This my answer

Explanation:

You can make a welcoming and safe place for all by making a place were people without a home can stay. You can also make a party at your house and invite your neighbors so they feel that they are wanted and important to be welcomed to a party.

That's all I could think of.

Answer: C.

Notes should correctly capture the key ideas of a text in the note-taker’s own words.

Answer:

I think it is d

Explanation:

Depending on the weather, the mood and feelings of people shift. Some could love rainy days and some could hate them, and some could be in between.

Answer:

Chapter 4,6,9

Explanation:

“Dally’s ok,” Johnny said defensively, and I nodded. You take up for your buddies no matter what they do. When you’re in a gang, you stick up for the members.

Ponyboy explains Johnny’s defense of Dally after Dally harasses Cherry and Marcia, two Socs, at the drive-in theater. Despite Dally being the aggressor in the situation, Johnny justifies his actions in coming to Dally’s defense. Ponyboy concludes that loyalty is paramount and expected when you are in a gang. The theme of loyalty recurs throughout the book: When characters do not show loyalty, chaos ensues.

Our one rule besides Stick together is Don’t get caught.

Two-Bit explains the logic of a fight between two greasers. Dally has slashed the tires of Tim Shepard, the leader of another greaser gang, so Shepard will have to fight Dally. Two-Bit justifies his involvement in the feud to Cherry and Marcia: Even though Dally deserves what’s coming to him, Two-Bit will fight alongside Dally because greasers stick together. The situation contrasts the greasers’ loyalty with the Socs’, who he later says will gang up on each other for sport. Loyalty is presented as a point of pride for the greasers throughout the novel.

I looked around, startled. I hadn’t realized Johnny was right behind me all the way.Ponyboy reflects on the surprise he felt when he realized Johnny followed him into the burning building to help save children who were trapped inside. Ponyboy uses the word “startled” to convey the significant change he has just understood. The time in the church has bonded Ponyboy and Johnny beyond their social class. Their loyalty as friends, above and beyond being greasers, has taken root. The decision to risk their lives for non-gang members reveals the humanity beneath their rough exteriors, the courage that extends deeper than what’s expected from a fellow gang member.

“You’re a traitor to your own kind and not loyal to us.”

Ponyboy lashes out at Cherry after she refuses to visit Johnny in the hospital. Cherry finds herself caught between the two gangs: She’s been spying on the Socs for the greasers, but she can’t show solidarity with the greasers by visiting Johnny. Ponyboy’s condemnation of her hits hard, and even he knows it. Ponyboy’s sense of loyalty is challenged by Cherry, a person who has mixed loyalties, but to whom he’s bonded as a friend.But then, Darry’s gone through a lot in his twenty years, grown up too fast.

Ponyboy reflects on his older brother Darry’s life circumstances. After their parents were killed in a car accident, Darry took on the role of primary caregiver, and works two jobs just to provide for Ponyboy and Sodapop. Ponyboy understands the importance of loyalty within their family: If the three brothers don’t work together, they are in threat of being separated. The story portrays the loyalty of the Curtis family and the greasers as being part of a strict code of honor that goes beyond social class.

All great examples!!!

Answer:

Reflection, absorption and re-emission.

To clarify, you mentioned light is not visible. Of course that is not true, we can see light. our retinas are sensitive to light within a certain range of frequencies. you may be commenting on the fact that if there is a beam of light in front of me traveling from right to left, I won’t see it. That’s true. If it were a ball I would see it. That is because light strikes the ball, is reflected, absorbed, and re-emitted or some combination of the above, then that light strikes my eye.

As a side note, if the ball were somehow changed by the light which struck it (change of course due to momentum of light impact) then I may not be able to trust that the image I see truly represents the current condition of the ball. But for most balls we can see, this is not the case. If, however, we do go smaller in our attempt to ‘see’ light, we won’t necessarily be able to trust our instinctive intuition. That is informed by the large scale world we observe with our unaided eye. We would have to learn to trust our observations however those observations come. And the observed truth of the very small, the world of quantum physics, is rather different than our unaided perception. It is nevertheless equally valid.

Back to the main point.

If you like to play the semantics game of asking whether you see the ball or see the light, suit yourself. The ball interacts with light, the light interacts with my eye, my eye sends data to my brain for interpretation. I’m fine with either version of ‘seeing’ the ball or ‘seeing’ the light.

Here’s an example to hopefully clarify.

I’m outside on a sunny day, no electric lights around, only sunlight. We all know sunlight is well collimated, one-directional. I’m in my back yard in the shade of my awning. No direct sunlight strikes me or the ball in my hand.

How do I see the ball in my hand?

Direct sunlight strikes a number of objects around me, the ground, my pool, etc. I don’t see any of that light. All of those objects reflect some light. That reflected light leaves the objects at certain limited angles based on the angle of incidence of the sunlight striking that surface. They also absorb some light. They then re-emit the light they absorb. Based on the surface characteristics, this re-emitted light shoots out in all directions away from the surface. They all become sources of multi-directional light nearby, just much lower intensity. Like a bunch of little light bulbs. So the ball I hold (in the awning’s shadow) is lit from a number of sources, just much more dimly than the ground lit by direct sunlight. And so the ball appears darker. It is in the shadow after all.

By the same principle, if the part of Earth you are standing on is in the shadow of the rest of the Earth, i.e. it is nighttime, then you won’t see anything. Unless of course there are other objects around Earth (moon, et al.) that absorb and re-emit light. When the sun, Earth, and moon are lined up so that the sunny side of the moon has a lot of its surface area facing towards Earth (full moon) then there is a lot of reflected and re-emited light striking Earth. Those are nights when it is easier to see by moonlight, which is of course sunlight.

Answer:

By 2050, human beings will have been building (build) and living in cities for around 10,000 years. It is estimated that, by this date, more than 70 percent of the world's population will be living (live) in urban environments. In preparation for this, developers in the US alone have constructed (construct) nearly ninety million new homes by 2050. The cities of the future are likely to be much cleaner places than those we inhabit today. By then architects will have designed (design) buildings that use smart materials to help reduce air pollution and we will use (use) less fossil fuel and more alternative energy for decades, making cities considerably less polluted than they are today. Solar panels will become (become) the norm on most buildings by 2050, and we will recycle (recycle) a much larger proportion of our waste than we do today. Where will you be living in 2050? Wherever it is, it is very likely to be in a city

Okay, so you see the question so is asking What does he believe about lying? and it tells you to give an example that is in the article, right.

So restating means rewriting it to make it an answer. So the question is what does he believe about lying?

- Answer:  you can put "Randy Cohen thought / or believes that lying is ... (put what he believes in ). For example, in paragraph (put the number) it tells the reader that (put something that supports your answer here).

So example he believes that lying is morally okay/ right. In paragraph 10, it explains that his views are that it helps people protect themselves or others.

I really hope that helps and if you have more questions just reply and i be happy to help!

Answer:

The dialogue is of the "outer dialogue" type and presents a formal language.

Explanation:

as we already know, dialogue is generally a conversation between two or more individuals, where everyone interacts within the same subject. However, the dialogue can also be done with a single individual who speaks to himself through his own thoughts. In the case of the dialogue presented in the question above, even if we have not been introduced to two individuals, we can consider it as an "outer dialogue" which is what the dialogues composed of a simple conversation between a person's friends are called. We can also see that the author uses a formal language, because those involved in the dialogue are talking about something commercial and that requires this type of language.

Answer:

2

Explanation:

is the correct answer

Answer:

A

Explanation:

well, I guess it depends on what are you talking about.

are you referring to the impact that doing what you like with passion can affect other people's perspectives?

then you can say something like

"therefore, the passion shown by a person can affect or impact their perspectives, and even their motivation to achieve certain goals."

Answer:

a

Explanation:

Answer:

a

Explanation:

it's what you want to ask the person

Explanation:

what do YOU want to ask a celebrity, this is your thoughts, and only your thoughts,

Answer:

Fellow workers in the same field of study.

Explanation:

Definition of colleague: "A person with whom one works in a profession or business."

Answer: C

Explanation:

Answer:

The Chilling Adventure of Sabrina is a story that includes horror and witchcraft. Sabrina Spellman must adjust to life as half-witch and half-mortal, while still fighting evil forces that try to hurt her, her family, and others.

---

I used the internet summary as something to use as inspo! You can change it up in any way you'd like

(I figured out brainly doesn't allow the word goooooogle. Interesting.)

Answer:

it looks like all of them has the same vowels as came? is it a singular answer? if not its all of them

Explanation:

Answer:

metaphor

Explanation:

Answer:

Wheres the poem?

Explanation:

Answer:

Because the civil war was anything but civil. civil means ordinary citizens and there cornernces

Explanation:

lol

Answer:

of course not you don't help me also thank you dear

Answer:

It makes Myra's effort seem more

intense and determined.

Answer:

The answer should be reflexive

Explanation:

Because if you cut 'myself' out, it doesn't really make sense. A reflexive sentence is usually like, 'I myself went out to the mall last night'. If you cut myself out of this sentence it would become, 'I went out to the mall last night' which still makes a lot of sense. In the statement, 'I myself have ready books', when you cut out 'myself' it becomes, 'I have ready books' which does not really sound right to me. So it would be a Reflexive pronoun!!!! If it makes sense when you remove a 'self' statement then it is an Intensive pronoun. If it does not make sense, then it isn't.

Hope this helped.

Answer:

I'm on Trials of Apollo

Explanation:

Answer:

both. an invention can only be realized through first, inspiration which gives one the idea to create and second the willpower and drive to get it done.

Answer:

what is this??

Explanation:

Objective *Identify terms that focus on speeches. Name

speeches to persuade their audience.Period ENG108B Unit 1 Arguments and

*Determine the methods that people use within

Speeches

Date

Fundamental Question Think about these questions as you work through the lesson. Can we listen to and read important speeches and other historical documents and analyze these documents for the use of persuasive devices and determine author’s point of view and purpose?

Questions / Clues Notes Write down all relevant notes and possible answers using the RACES writing strategy when appropriate.

Lesson 1.01

Identify the following

terms:

1. Argument

2. Claim

3. Fallacious Reasoning

4. Relevant

5. Credible

How does figurative

language enhance the

meaning of a text?

What do you look for

when evaluating an

argument?

What makes evidence

relevant What makes it

sufficient?

What strategy can you

use for identifying

fallacious reasoning?

Lesson 1.02

Describe how you

recognized fallacious

reasoning in the text “The

American Promise”.

Can evidence be relevant

but not sufficient? Explain

your answer.

Read On: Achievement

Gap

Which article did you choose to read on

NEWSELA?

Was there fallacious

reasoning in the article you read? Explain and provide an example of why or why not.

Lesson 1.03

Who was Sojourner Truth?

Did Sojourner Truth use valid reasoning and

relevant and sufficient evidence? Were you convinced? Use examples from the text to explain.

Lesson 1.04

Define the following terms:

1. Charged Language

2. Viewpoint

3. Evidence

4. Reason

5. Sufficient

6. Critical Listening

What does a speaker need to include in a speech to create valid reasoning?

Lesson 1.05

What was Reagan’s

viewpoint in his speech “Remarks on East-West Relations”?

Is his reasoning valid? Why or why not?

What evidence does he provide and is it relevant and/or sufficient?

Why would a speaker use fallacious reasoning or distorted evidence?

Lesson 1.08

Identify the term parallel structure.

List at least three types of compound elements that should use parallel

structure.

Identify all coordinating conjunctions using the acronym of FANBOYS.

Lesson 1.09

Identify the following terms and give examples:

1. hypophora

2. ethos

3. pathos

4. logos

5. parallelism

6. Repetition

7. Appeals

Live Class Notes:

How did the excerpt from the “Emancipation

Proclamation” use ethos, pathos, logos?

1. 2. 3.

F

A N B

O Y S

Lesson 1.10

How effective is the use of rhetorical devices such as hypophora, parallelism, and repetition in “Give Me Liberty, or Give Me Death?” Give at least two examples to support your evaluation.

Choose a line or two from the passage that you found to be especially moving or effective. Why was it effective or moving?

Lesson 1.11

Vocabulary:

What terms from the text were new or unknown to you? Define them.

Who was Frederick

Douglass?

What rhetorical devices does Douglass use in his speech?

Share an example from the text.

Choose a line or two from the passage that you found to be especially moving or effective. Why was it effective or moving?

Answer:

C) The third book of the series

Explanation:

i just did it :)

Answer:

C

Explanation:

i completed this on usatestprep

Answer:

Rhyme

Explanation:

Lines 1 & 3 : Alabama, Louisiana

Lines 2 & 4 : Knee, See

Answer: A. Blake is outraged by the fact that families allow and encourage child labor.

Explanation:

In this poem by William Blake, he hopes to expose the corrupting influences of the Church on families as they lead families away from providing the best they can for their children and instead condoning child labor with the Chimney sweepers being the focus.

Blake is outraged that the families cannot see what they are doing to their children by putting religion above the children's happiness and instead pushing them to engage in child labor.