Answer:
Explanation:
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a provision included in the United States Constitution during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. It stated that slaves would be counted as three-fifths of a person for the purpose of apportioning representation and taxation among the states. This compromise was necessary to secure the agreement of southern states to the new Constitution, as they wanted slaves to be counted as full persons for the purpose of representation, but not for the purpose of taxation.
The Three-Fifths Compromise has been widely criticized for perpetuating the institution of slavery and treating enslaved persons as less than fully human. One way to improve the Constitution with regard to this issue would be to remove any provisions that treat individuals differently based on their race, ethnicity, or any other protected characteristic. This could include amendments that explicitly prohibit the use of race or ethnicity in determining representation or taxation, or that guarantee equal protection under the law for all people regardless of their race or ethnicity.
Another way to address the legacy of the Three-Fifths Compromise and other discriminatory provisions of the Constitution would be to promote greater civic education and engagement around issues of race and equality. This could involve expanding educational resources and opportunities to help people understand the history and ongoing impacts of racism, as well as providing greater support for organizations and initiatives that promote diversity, inclusion, and social justice.
Who developed a plan to fight the Great Depression?
Truman
Hoover
Roosevelt
Martin
Please mark brainiest it's a test.
how did militarism contribute to the outbreak of World War 1?
a. it promoted the neutrality of certain nations.
b. it led to an arms race among nations
c. it led to vying alliance systems
d. it promoted ideas of self-degermation of different people
Answer:
the military establishment began to have a greater influence on public policy. hope it helps.
Explanation:
please help me with this history question i’ll give brainlist
Answer:
C. The Soviet Union was given more land to keep them from invading the rest of Europe. All of the empires of Europe were split up, and many new countries were created.
Explanation:
which of the following demonstrates the impact of science in european society in the immediate years after world war ii?
Governments governed by socialism acknowledged that funding scientific research fell under their purview.
The impact of science in European society in the immediate years after World War II was significant. The war had accelerated technological advancements, particularly in the areas of aviation, electronics, and nuclear energy. The development of radar, for example, played a crucial role in the war effort, and the research that went into developing it led to many other technological breakthroughs.
After the war, there was a widespread belief that science could be used to improve people's lives and create a better future. Governments invested heavily in scientific research and development, particularly in the areas of health, agriculture, and transportation. This led to the creation of many new technologies and products, such as antibiotics, synthetic fertilizers, and automobiles, that changed the way people lived and worked.
To know more about World War II
brainly.com/question/10211667
#SPJ4
In an initial post, reflect on the following points of Mary Rowlandson's narrative:
Questions for discussion:
Speculate about Rowlandson’s purpose in writing this narrative: is it a personal account or essentially didactic—or are the purposes mingled here?
• How does the narrative compare with other Puritan works that show
triumph or redemption after suffering?
• What do the poems of Bradstreet and the Narrative of Rowlandson,
when looked at together, suggest about the fears and anxieties of
women in Puritan society?
Answer:
Mary Rowlandson's narrative, "A Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson," details her experiences during her eleven-week captivity by Native Americans in 1675. In this narrative, Rowlandson provides a vivid account of the events leading up to her capture, the conditions of her captivity, and her eventual release.
Regarding Rowlandson's purpose in writing this narrative, it seems that both personal and didactic elements are mingled here. On one hand, the narrative is a personal account of her traumatic experience and the hardships she faced during her captivity. On the other hand, Rowlandson also uses her narrative to offer religious and moral lessons to her readers, emphasizing the importance of faith in God and highlighting the dangers of straying from the Puritan faith.
In comparison to other Puritan works that show triumph or redemption after suffering, Rowlandson's narrative is unique in its focus on the suffering itself. While other Puritan works may emphasize the triumph of faith over adversity, Rowlandson's narrative instead dwells on the physical and emotional hardships she endured. However, like other Puritan works, Rowlandson's narrative ultimately does offer a message of hope and redemption through faith in God.
When looked at together, the poems of Bradstreet and the Narrative of Rowlandson suggest a shared set of fears and anxieties experienced by women in Puritan society. Both works highlight the precarious position of women in a patriarchal society, where they are subject to the whims of men and must navigate a narrow path of acceptable behavior. The fear of violence and captivity, as experienced by Rowlandson, is also a prominent theme in Bradstreet's poetry. Overall, these works suggest that women in Puritan society faced unique challenges and anxieties, which were shaped by both their gender and their religious beliefs.
After WWII, Americans believed that the USSR had gotten the atomic bomb because
a. All of these.
b. Certain American citizens had spied on America's bomb secrets and given them to the USSR.
c. They were simply ahead of America in terms of technology and science education.
d. They had recruited several German scientists.
210,000 people—children, women, and men—died when the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945.
What Americans believed that the USSR had gotten the atomic bomb?
The American people are informed that the Soviet Union has detonated a nuclear weapon by President Harry S. Truman in a remarkably understated and well written statement. The Soviet achievement, which was years ahead of what most American officials believed was feasible, sparked a panic in the US administration.
The atomic bomb was created by the United States during the closing phases of World War II, and two bombs were dropped on Japan in August 1945. Relations between the United States and the Soviet Union were already deteriorating at the time of the bombings in Japan. President Truman was among the American politicians who grew to view the country's atomic monopoly as a crucial advantage in the escalating Cold War with Russia.
Learn more about USSR:
https://brainly.com/question/30281521
#SPJ1
In a paragraph, explain the significance of the Civil Rights Movement of the
1950s-1960s. Cite at least ONE specific example that helped promote civil rights
for minorities in America.
Answer:
The Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s-1960s aimed to eliminate racial discrimination and segregation against African Americans and other minorities. Through civil disobedience, nonviolent protests, and legal challenges, activists and organizations like Martin Luther King Jr. and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference made significant progress in the fight for civil rights. The Montgomery bus boycott in 1955, led by Rosa Parks, protested the segregation of African American passengers on public buses and ultimately led to a Supreme Court ruling that declared segregation on public buses unconstitutional. This movement helped pave the way for more equitable and inclusive policies and practices, making it a crucial milestone in American history.
when several latin american nations defaulted on debt payments to the united states in 1931, Hoover took what action?
In 1931, President Herbert Hoover took action to respond to the several Latin American nations defaulting on debt payments to the United States. He established the Good Neighbor Policy, which stated that the U.S. would not intervene in the internal affairs of Latin American countries and that it would respect their sovereignty.
When several Latin American nations defaulted on debt payments to the United States in 1931, Hoover took the action of the “Hoover Moratorium.” In 1931, the United States was dealing with economic depression caused by the Wall Street crash of 1929. In 1931, many Latin American countries were unable to pay their debts. In response, President Hoover declared a 1-year moratorium on all intergovernmental debts. Hoover declared a suspension of payments on public debts to the United States in 1931.
Hoover announced the Hoover Moratorium on June 20, 1931, calling for a one-year postponement of all inter-governmental debts. Thus, we can say that when several Latin American nations defaulted on debt payments to the United States in 1931, Hoover took the action of the “Hoover Moratorium.”
Hoover's Moratorium declaration stated that the period would allow countries to revive their economies, reestablish their public finances, and set up methods to repay their debt obligations. The announcement was aimed at alleviating the immense amount of debt that Latin American countries owed to the United States. Hoover had good intentions with this program, but it did not turn out to be the best course of action, and it had a devastating effect on the world's economy. This policy focused on cooperation and diplomacy, instead of military interventions and economic sanctions.
For more such questions on intergovernmental debts , Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/10679730
#SPJ11
Some historians argue that alliances caused World War I. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary caused alliances to declare war on each other. The assassination was done to free land from Austria-Hungary. Serbs living in Bosnia and Herzegovina wanted to rule themselves. Because of this assassination, Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia. Russia was an ally of Serbia. Germany was an ally of Austria-Hungary. The two mutual-defense alliances were now at war.
Which statement best identifies the reason Franz Ferdinand was assassinated?
Serbs in Bosnia and Herzegovina wanted self-rule.
Austria-Hungary decided to declare war on Serbia.
Russia was an ally of Serbia and wanted to stop Austria-Hungary.
Mutual-defense alliances wanted to start a war in Austria-Hungary.
Answer:
Serbs in Bosnia and Herzegovina wanted self-rule.
Explanation:
The others are a result of the assassination, not a cause.
prior to the 1990s, which of the following was the primary form of agency in the real estate industry?
Prior to the 1990s, the primary form of agency in the real estate industry was the traditional model of "seller agency." So, option B is correct.
In this model, real estate agents worked primarily for the seller of a property and were responsible for marketing and selling the property on behalf of the seller. The buyer of the property was typically represented by a separate agent or was expected to represent themselves.
However, this model began to change in the 1990s with the emergence of buyer agency, where agents represented the interests of the buyer rather than the seller. This new model of agency helped to shift the balance of power in the real estate industry towards buyers, allowing them to have greater representation and protection during the home-buying process.
To know more about seller agency
brainly.com/question/28204707
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
prior to the 1990s, which of the following was the primary form of agency in the real estate industry?
A) Buyer agency, or
B) Seller agency.
What was the main result of the battle of horseshoe bend?
Answer:
The Battle of Horseshoe Bend, fought on March 27, 1814 effectively ended Creek resistance to American advances into the southeast, opening up the Mississippi Territory for pioneer settlement.
Explanation:
Which piece of evidence best reveals the idea that facing a fear requires determination?
The piece of evidence that best reveals the idea that facing a fear is loneliness as that requires determination. Hence the answer is c. He feels alone.
What does fear mean in psychology?When one feels or recognizes a threat or danger, they experience the highly unpleasant sensation of fear. Fear results in physiological changes that might result in responses like putting an aggressive defense or running away from the threat.
Origin of fear?The amygdala, a region of the brain, is where fear doing first itself. "A danger input, such as the sight of a predator, stimulates a fear response in the amygdala, which activates regions engaged in preparation for motor tasks involved in fight or flight," claims Smithsonian Magazine.
To know more about Fear visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13981991
#SPJ1
50 points & brainliest
Choose two of the excerpted newspaper editorials that seem to take different views of the Brown v. Board of Education ruling. Then write an essay examining what events led to the ruling as well as the effects of the ruling on the larger civil rights movement. Use information from the excerpted newspaper editorials, the lesson, and your own research in your response.
The Brown v. Board of Education ruling in 1954 was a landmark decision in the fight for civil rights in the United States. The ruling declared that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional and violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. While the ruling was a victory for the civil rights movement, it was met with mixed reactions from different segments of society, as reflected in the excerpted newspaper editorials.
One editorial in The Richmond News Leader from May 18, 1954, argued that the Brown v. Board of Education ruling was an overreach of federal power and would lead to chaos and conflict. The editorial claimed that the ruling went against established legal precedent and would disrupt the long-held practice of separate but equal. The editorial stated, "This is not the first time that the Supreme Court has been deluded by the false theory that it has the power to reshape the Constitution."
In contrast, an editorial in The New York Times from the same day praised the Brown v. Board of Education ruling as a significant step towards ending segregation and achieving racial equality. The editorial declared, "The Supreme Court has taken a courageous step in affirming the principles of democracy." The editorial also acknowledged that the ruling would face resistance and that it would take time for it to be fully implemented, but it was a necessary step in the struggle for civil rights.
The Brown v. Board of Education ruling had significant effects on the larger civil rights movement. It paved the way for the desegregation of schools and other public spaces and challenged the legal basis of segregation. The ruling also inspired other civil rights activists to fight for their rights and encouraged them to use the legal system to do so.
However, the ruling also faced backlash from those who opposed desegregation and the civil rights movement as a whole. Some states even defied the ruling and refused to integrate their schools, leading to further legal battles and tensions between federal and state governments.
In conclusion, the Brown v. Board of Education ruling was a significant moment in the history of the civil rights movement in the United States. While it was met with mixed reactions, it marked a turning point in the fight against segregation and discrimination. The ruling's effects were far-reaching, impacting not only the education system but also other areas of society.
Answer:
The Brown v. Board of Education ruling was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court in 1954 that declared segregation in public schools unconstitutional. This ruling was a critical moment in the civil rights movement, and it had a significant impact on American society as a whole. While some newspaper editorials praised the decision, others were critical. This essay will examine the events that led to the ruling, as well as the effects of the ruling on the larger civil rights movement.
The Brown v. Board of Education ruling was the result of a legal challenge brought by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) in 1951. The NAACP argued that segregation in public schools violated the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution. The case was consolidated with several other cases from across the country that also challenged segregation in public schools. The Supreme Court heard arguments in the case in 1952, and the case was re-argued in 1953.
In its unanimous decision, the Supreme Court held that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional because it violated the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. The Court reasoned that separate educational facilities were inherently unequal and that segregation had a detrimental effect on the education and development of black children.
The Brown v. Board of Education ruling had a profound impact on the larger civil rights movement. The ruling was a critical victory for the NAACP and other civil rights organizations that had been fighting segregation for decades. The decision also gave a significant boost to the growing civil rights movement, which was gaining momentum in the 1950s.
One of the newspaper editorials that praised the Brown v. Board of Education ruling was published in The New York Times. The editorial argued that the decision was a victory for American democracy and that it would help to strengthen the nation's commitment to equal rights. The editorial also acknowledged that the ruling would be difficult to implement, but it called on Americans to work together to ensure that the decision was fully enforced.
Another editorial that took a different view was published in The Daily Oklahoman. The editorial argued that the Brown v. Board of Education ruling was an example of judicial activism and that it undermined the authority of state and local governments. The editorial also claimed that the decision would lead to chaos and conflict in the South.
Despite these criticisms, the Brown v. Board of Education ruling had a profound and lasting impact on American society. The decision paved the way for other civil rights victories, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. It also helped to inspire a new generation of civil rights leaders, including Martin Luther King Jr., who would go on to lead the movement in the 1960s.
In conclusion, the Brown v. Board of Education ruling was a critical moment in the civil rights movement, and it had a significant impact on American society. The ruling was the result of years of hard work by civil rights organizations, and it marked a turning point in the struggle for equal rights. While some newspaper editorials praised the decision, others were critical, but the ruling's impact was undeniable. It helped to pave the way for other civil rights victories and inspired a new generation of leaders to continue the fight for equality.
What features of the domestic slave trade does Brown’s narrative illuminate? Why do you think he brought his story to an antislavery society? How do you think people responded to this narrative?
Answer:
What features of the domestic slave trade does Brown’s narrative illuminate? Why do you think he brought his story to an antislavery society? How do you think people responded to this narrative?
Explanation:
The narrative of Henry “Box” Brown provides a firsthand account of the brutality and inhumanity of the domestic slave trade in the United States. Brown’s story highlights several key features of this trade, including the separation of families, the forced migration of slaves across state lines, and the dehumanization of slaves as they were treated as commodities to be bought and sold. Brown’s narrative also sheds light on the various methods that slaves used to resist their captivity, including acts of sabotage, subversion, and escape.
Brown likely brought his story to an antislavery society because he wanted to raise awareness about the horrors of slavery and to rally support for the abolitionist cause. By sharing his experiences with a sympathetic audience, Brown hoped to expose the injustice and cruelty of slavery and to persuade others to join the fight for its abolition. Moreover, by presenting his story as a testament to the resilience and courage of enslaved people, Brown sought to challenge prevailing stereotypes about the inferiority and passivity of slaves.
It is difficult to say how people responded to Brown’s narrative, as attitudes towards slavery and abolition varied widely depending on factors such as region, class, and political affiliation. Some people may have been moved by Brown’s story and inspired to join the abolitionist movement, while others may have dismissed it as propaganda or rejected it outright. However, given the widespread circulation of Brown’s narrative and the intense debates over slavery that were taking place in the United States during this period, it is likely that his story played a significant role in shaping public opinion and advancing the cause of abolition.
The anti-communist sentiments of the 1950s are often referred to as the "Red Scare." In your
opinion, to what extent was communism an actual threat to American citizens?
Answer:
The extent to which communism was an actual threat to American citizens during the 1950s is up for debate. On one hand, the Soviet Union had become a nuclear superpower and had the potential to cause significant harm to the United States. On the other hand, the Cold War was largely a propaganda war, and the actual threat of a Soviet invasion of the United States was minimal. It is also important to note that the fear of communism was largely driven by the politics of the era, and the Red Scare was used as a tool to discredit political opponents. Ultimately, the extent to which communism posed an actual threat to American citizens during the 1950s is difficult to assess.
Explanation:
please mark me brainliest
Which is the belief of the people that a government has the right to make public policy
Answer:
The belief that a government has the right to make public policy is known as the doctrine of popular sovereignty
Compare and contrast Samples’s and McConnell’s views about the Electoral College.
Answer:
Explanation:
Both Samples and McConnell have expressed their views about the Electoral College, but they have different perspectives on this issue.
John Samples, the vice president of the Cato Institute, has criticized the Electoral College as an outdated and undemocratic system. He argues that the Electoral College gives too much power to small states and allows for the possibility of electing a president who does not have a popular mandate. Samples believe that the president should be elected by a popular vote, as this would better reflect the will of the people and ensure that all votes count equally.
On the other hand, Mitch McConnell, a former senator and Senate majority leader, has defended the Electoral College as an important component of the U.S. electoral system. He argues that the Electoral College helps to ensure that the president is elected through a balanced and representative process, with every state having a voice in the election. McConnell believes that the Electoral College is a safeguard against the tyranny of the majority and helps to protect the rights of smaller states and minority groups.
In summary, Samples and McConnell have differing views on the Electoral College. While Samples criticizes it as undemocratic and advocates for a popular vote system, McConnell defends it as an important component of the U.S. electoral system that balances the interests of all states and protects against the tyranny of the majority.
Was the use of atomic bombs during World War II justified and ethical?
Answer:
Justification: Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki The use of atomic bombs by America to attach Hiroshima and Nagasaki cities which are in Japan has been a controversial debate over time. The debate has for decades raged on whether the United States was justified to use atomic bombs during the final phases of the World War 2.
Explanation:
in 200 words. In addition to the reflection guidelines in the syllabus, I would like you to consider whether or not a company like Black Water could ever contribute to a common good. What would a Hobbesian realist say? Be sure to ground your response in the text!
following the readings please include the readings in the text!
Blackwater's actions would likely be justified as long as they serve their self-interest, which may or may not align with the common good
What would the opinion be?A company like Blackwater, a private military contractor, could potentially contribute to the common good by providing security services in areas where the state's capacity to provide such services is limited.
The company's involvement in controversial activities such as the Iraq War and accusations of human rights abuses raise ethical concerns.
From a Hobbesian realist perspective, the pursuit of self-interest is the primary motivating factor for individuals and organizations, including corporations.
Therefore, Blackwater's actions would likely be justified as long as they serve their self-interest, which may or may not align with the common good.
Ultimately, the answer to whether Blackwater could contribute to the common good depends on one's values and priorities.
Read more about Hobbesian realist here:
https://brainly.com/question/24122554
#SPJ1
The special investigation into the Whitewater real estate scandal
resulted in charges that Clinton had committed perjury.
led to allegations of sexual harassment and misconduct.
revealed that Clinton was guilty of obstruction of justice.
produced no evidence that Clinton had committed a crime.
Answer:
The special investigation into the Whitewater real estate scandal produced no evidence that Clinton had committed a crime. While the investigation did uncover some controversial activities involving the Clintons and their associates, including allegations of financial impropriety and conflicts of interest, there was no evidence to support the accusations of criminal behavior that had been leveled against them. Ultimately, the investigation led to no criminal charges against President Clinton or his wife Hillary. However, it did lead to a significant political scandal that affected Clinton's presidency and public perception of his administration.
Explanation:
The Whitewater scandal was a controversy that arose during President Bill Clinton's time in office. It involved an investigation into a failed real estate venture in Arkansas that the Clintons had invested in during the 1970s and 1980s. The investigation was launched in 1994 by the Office of the Independent Counsel (OIC) and lasted for several years, ultimately concluding in 2000.
During the investigation, allegations were made that the Clintons had received favorable treatment in connection with the Whitewater deal and that they had attempted to cover up evidence of their involvement. There were also accusations of other improprieties, including financial conflicts of interest and political influence peddling.
The investigation was led by various independent counsels over the years, including Kenneth Starr, who took over in 1994. The investigation was controversial and highly politicized, with some accusing Starr of pursuing a partisan agenda against the Clintons.
Despite the intense scrutiny and media attention, the investigation ultimately produced no evidence that the Clintons had committed any crimes. While some of their associates were convicted of various charges, including obstruction of justice and perjury, the Clintons themselves were never charged with any wrongdoing.
However, the Whitewater investigation did lead to other controversies during Clinton's presidency, including the Monica Lewinsky scandal, which resulted in impeachment proceedings against him. The investigation also contributed to public distrust of Clinton and his administration, and it continues to be a subject of political controversy and debate to this day.
Answer:
d. produced no evidence that Clinton had committed a crime.
Explanation:
trust
Using your knowledge of world history, which of the following statements BEST compares the two sources?
A. Both sourced demonstrate consequences of the
Opium Wars.
B. Both sources demonstrate the connection between
global migration and industrialization.
C. Both sources demonstrate ethnic and racial
prejudice.
D. Both sources demonstrate continuity in social
structure.
Both sources exhibit racial and ethnic bias. (Choice c)
How would you define world history?History is examined from a worldwide viewpoint in the branch of historical study known as world history and global history. It has been around for centuries, and notable exponents include Voltaire, Hegelian, Marx, Oswald Spengler, & Arnold J. Toynbee. In the later 20th century, the field saw a significant increase in activity. The early historians of the modern era, who produced their works in the years following World War II, tended to subscribe to the conventional belief that history started shortly after the initial written records appeared in Egypt and Mesopotamia around 5,000 years ago.
To know more about world history visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29211721
#SPJ1
Help, please?
1. How did the Punic wars impact the history and development of the Roman world? What were the long-term economic and social impacts of Hannibal's march through Italy? How did the defeat of Carthage impact the later development of the Roman world?
2. What issues in the Roman Republic did Gracchi, Marius, Sulla, and Caesar attempt to address? To what extent did they succeed or fail?
3. Compare and contrast the first emperors of China and Rome. What were the policies of each emperor and how did each achieve his goals? Which was the most successful?
4. Discuss the process of unification in China under the first emperor. What reforms did he initiate and what was their impact on China? To what extent did these reforms survive his reign and influence other dynasties?
5.According to the Marco Polo narrative included in this chapter, what were the special characteristics of Yuan China? Why do you think Europeans found it hard to believe that such wonders existed in China? What do the reactions to Marco Polo and his narrative itself reflect about European knowledge of China?
1.
The Roman victory over Carthage in the Punic Wars gave way to the establishment of the Roman Empire. Despite the great victories of Carthage during the wars, the Romans were able to outmaneuver and eventually conquer the remains of the African empire
2.
The Gracchi brothers attempted to address growing inequalities through land reforms and price controls.
3.
The Roman and Chinese had much similarities but also many differences. Their economies were both agrarian and monetized, but adopted different models of production organization. Their societies were both patriarchic, conservative and stratified.
4.
The Polos were likely shrewd, alert, and courageous; they traded with th
Which of the following events occurred in the weeks following the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand?
1. Germany declared war on both Russia and France
2. Russia and the Austro-Hungarian Empire began hostilities.
3. Germany invaded Belgium
The event that occurred in the weeks following the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand is Germany declared war on both Russia and France.
Archduke Franz Ferdinand was a prince of Austria-Este and was assassinated in Sarajevo, the capital of Bosnia and Herzegovina, on June 28, 1914. This incident is the immediate cause of World War I. The following events occurred in the weeks following the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand: On July 5, the Kaiser met with his leading advisers and set Germany on a course that led to war with Russia and France. The Kaiser's army leaders demanded war to suppress the Russian threat before it was too late.
Germany declared war on Russia on August 1 and France on August 3. The Schlieffen Plan was launched by Germany on August 4, which was an attack on France via Belgium. This act of aggression sparked the First World War.
For more such questions on assassination
https://brainly.com/question/30191539
#SPJ11
Which statements are true of the September 11, 2001, attacks against the United States? Check all that apply.
All true statements about the September 11, 2001, attacks against the United States. The attacks involved hijacking of four planes, and killed over 3,000 people. The attacks were carried out by al-Qaeda terrorists and were the deadliest terrorist attack on U.S. soil in history.
What is hijacking?Hijacking is a criminal act in which a person or group unlawfully and forcefully takes control of a vehicle, aircraft, or other mode of transportation. It is typically done with the intention of stealing the vehicle or using it to commit other crimes. Hijacking is a serious crime that can lead to physical and psychological harm, as well as the loss of property. In some cases, hijacking can even lead to death. Hijacking is a form of terrorism and is illegal in most countries. To prevent hijacking, many countries have implemented strict security measures for air, road, and sea travel. These measures can include increased security checks, armed guards, and the installation of metal detectors.
To learn more about hijacking
https://brainly.com/question/3523284
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
Which statements are true of the September 11, 2001, attacks against the United States? Check all that apply.
A. It was the deadliest terrorist attack on U.S. soil in history
B. The attacks involved hijacking of four planes
C. The attacks killed over 3,000 people
D. The attacks were carried out by al-Qaeda terrorists
I need help again lol
Its that dude called Joseph Fourier
Anger over the Declaration of Pillnitz
In August 1791 the monarchs of Austria and Prussia issued the Declaration of Pillnitz, which professed their willingness to intervene in France to restore Louis XVI's rule if necessary. Angered by this intrusion into French affairs, the Jacobins declared war on Austria the following spring, proclaiming willingness to "incite a war of people against kings."
Answer: Declaration of Pillnitz, joint declaration issued on August 27, 1791, by Holy Roman Emperor Leopold II and King Frederick William II of Prussia, urging European powers to unite to restore the monarchy in France; French King Louis XVI had been reduced to a constitutional monarch during the French Revolution. The French government largely interpreted it as a threat to its sovereignty, and a series of provocations ensued, culminating in France declaring war on Austria (over which Leopold ruled) in April 1792.
The French Revolution was greeted with apprehension by many European leaders, who feared unrest in their own countries. Monarchs grew particularly worried as Louis XVI was forced to accept the authority of the newly proclaimed National Assembly in 1789. Unhappy as a constitutional monarch, he engaged in various duplicities, and in June 1791 he attempted to escape to Varennes but was subsequently captured. Two months later Leopold and Frederick William met in Pillnitz, Saxony (now in Dresden, Germany). Both were concerned about the possible spread of revolution, and they also faced strong pressure from French émigrés to intervene. Furthermore, Leopold was the brother of Louis’s wife, Marie Antoinette, whose safety was in doubt. These concerns led the two men to issue a five-sentence declaration that stated “that they view the situation in which the King of France currently finds himself as a subject of common interest for all of Europe’s sovereigns.” They continued by calling on these powers to “use the most efficient means…to place the King of France in a position to be totally free to consolidate the bases of a monarchical government.”
The Declaration of Independence did all of the following except A) invoke the natural rights of humankind to justify revolt. B) catalog the tyrannical actions of King George III. C) argue that royal tyranny justified revolt. D) offered the British one last chance at reconciliation. E) accused the British of violating the natural rights of the Americans.
In the following question, The Declaration of Independence did all of the following except offering the British one last chance at reconciliation. The correct "option D)"
The Declaration of Independence, The United States Declaration of Independence is a declaration that was adopted by the Second Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, and signed in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, by 56 delegates. The Declaration was a formal explanation of why Congress had voted to declare independence from Great Britain, more than a year after the outbreak of the American Revolutionary War.
In summary, The correct answer is "option D)" The Declaration of Independence did all of the following except offering the British one last chance at reconciliation.
For more such questions on Declaration of Independence
brainly.com/question/9515546
#SPJ11
A. girl scout school encampment
question:
1.what have you learned or realized throughout the whole activity?
2.do you think that participating in this activity helped you developed, have fun and becoming aware of the entire globe's issues?
B.world thinking day
question:
1.what have you learned or realized throughout the whole activity?
2.do you think that participating in this activity helped you aware of the entire globe's issues?
pls help me to answer directly.thank you
(with respect answer)
The correct answers to the given question related to a girl scout school encampment are below:
A. Girl Scout School Encampment:From my knowledge of such events, participants often learn valuable skills such as teamwork, leadership, and survival skills in the outdoors. They may also learn about environmental stewardship, community service, and cultural diversity.
Participating in the Girl Scout School Encampment can be a fun and exciting way to develop new skills and become more aware of global issues. By engaging in outdoor activities and learning about environmental issues, participants may become more conscious of their impact on the environment and learn to take actions to reduce their carbon footprint.
B. World Thinking Day:
World Thinking Day is a day of celebration and learning for Girl Scouts and Girl Guides around the world. Participants learn about different cultures, traditions, and global issues. They may engage in activities that help them understand and appreciate the diversity of people and cultures around the world.
Participating in World Thinking Day can help participants become more aware of global issues and develop a sense of empathy for people from different backgrounds. By learning about different cultures and traditions, they may become more tolerant and understanding of others. They may also be inspired to take action to address global issues such as poverty, inequality, and environmental degradation.
Read more about girls scout here:
https://brainly.com/question/30667300
#SPJ1
People adopt the same impression management strategies across situations.
True
False
Answer:
Explanation:
False. People do not always adopt the same impression management strategies across situations. The strategies used by individuals to manage their impressions may vary depending on the specific social context, audience, and goals. For example, an individual may present a different image of themselves in a job interview than they would in a social setting with friends. Additionally, cultural and individual differences may also impact the use of impression management strategies. Therefore, it is not accurate to say that people always adopt the same strategies across situations.
Please answer all questions thank you its due today the questions or on the pdf I attached
The Nation of Islam (NOI) regards Wallace D. Fard as a divine and mysterious figure who brought a new message of Islam to the African American community in the early 20th century.
What is the nation of Islam?The NOI teaches that Fard was not only a religious leader but also a social reformer who sought to uplift the black community from the oppression and discrimination they faced.
According to NOI teachings, Fard founded the organization in Detroit, Michigan, in 1930 and appointed Elijah Muhammad as his successor. Fard disappeared in 1934, and his whereabouts and fate are unknown. However, the NOI believes that he will one day return to complete his mission.
The importance of these beliefs to the NOI is that they provide a unique and empowering identity for African Americans, separate from mainstream Islam and Christianity. The NOI's teachings on Fard also emphasize self-reliance, self-determination, and the need for African Americans to come together and work towards their own liberation and progress.
Learn more about Islam on;
https://brainly.com/question/4466
#SPJ1
Read the Nation of Islam Perspective on its founder, Briefly summarize what you have learned from the assigned reading(s) and discuss why these are important to you.