PLEASE HELP MEEEEEEE EMERGENCY :(​

Step-by-step explanation:

area of square = 1

area of a circle in square = [tex]\pi r^2 = \pi *(1/2)^2 = \frac{\pi }{4}[/tex]

bu estimate  [tex]p^ = X/n = 760/1000 = 0.76

Therefore,

[tex]\frac{\pi }{4} \approx 0.76[/tex]

[tex]\pi \approx 0.76*4 =3.04[/tex]

b) if n tend to infinity

[tex]\pi will approach 3.14[/tex]

Answer:

uvfhmfa

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The slope 7/5 and the y intercept is -3

Step-by-step explanation:

Y=7/5x-3

This equation is written in slope intercept form

y = mx+b where m is the slope and b is the y intercept

The slope 7/5 and the y intercept is -3

Answer:

m(arc CD) = 112°

Step-by-step explanation:

Use the property of intersecting chords and angles between these chords,

m∠CED = [tex]\frac{1}{2}(\text{arc CD}+\text{arc}AB)[/tex]

m∠CED + m∠AED = 180°

80° + m∠CED = 180°

m∠CED = 100°

Now substitute the measure of angle CED and arc AB in the expression,

100° = [tex]\frac{1}{2}(88^{\circ}+\text{arc CD})[/tex]

200° = 88° + m(arc CD)

m(arc CD) = 112°

Answer:

350

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

From Left (earliest) to Right (most recent)

First Pharaoh   3100 BC

First Babylon    1830 BC

First Mali            1235 CE

First US President 1789 CE

Answer:

$53.07

Step-by-step explanation:

Delta Math

Answer:

False.

Step-by-step explanation:

Equivalent systems of equations are those that have the same solutions or roots, although they have different numbers of equations. Equivalent systems of equations must have the same number of unknowns.

In other words, two systems of equations are said to be equivalent when they have the same solutions. Equivalent systems of equations do not have to have the same number of equations, although they do have to have the same number of unknowns.

So, the sentence is false.

Answer:

A rational number is one that may be represented in the manner p/q.

245/1000 = 0.245

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer and Step-by-step explanation:

Solve for x.

First, we divide both sides of the equation by 2.

2(8 - 2x) = 7 - x

Distribute the 2.

16 - 4x = 7 - x

Add 4x to and subtract 7 from both sides of the equation.

9 = 3x

Divide by 3 to both sides of the equation.

x = 3 <-- This is the answer.

#teamtrees #PAW (Plant And Water)

Answer:

x = 3

General Formulas and Concepts:

Pre-Algebra

Order of Operations: BPEMDAS

Distributive Property

Equality Properties

Algebra I

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Define

Identify

4(8 - 2x) = 2(7 - x)

Step 2: Solve for x

Aver si le entiendes bro

Answer:

When the demand for a good is highly elastic, the producer can increase revenue by reducing the price slightly.

Explanation:

Prices can either be Elastic, Inelastic, or Unitary.

The assumption is that the scenario in the question is in a perfect market. A perfect market is one where there are numerous buyers and sellers and there is little or no gap in information about market conditions such as cost of input, prices of the competition, etc.

When the demand for a product is elastic, it means that it is sensitive to changes in price. Price Elasticity is in degrees. When the demand for a product is highly elastic, it means that small changes in price lead to even greater changes in demand.

So for the producer to increase revenue in the short run (all things being equal) all they need to do is reduce the price slightly. This will increase revenue because it most likely will translate to a more than proportionate increase in quantity demanded.

Recall that markets are dynamic and the most predictable reaction of the other producers to this move will be an equal or even greater reduction in price in order to win back lost customers. Hence to sustainably maintain this position The producer will have to ensure that their product is sufficiently differentiated with unique value additions that are impossible or difficult to replicate.

Cheers

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  3.8 radians

Step-by-step explanation:

The length of an arc is given by ...

  s = rθ . . . . . where r is the radius and θ is in radians

so the angle is ...

  θ = s/r

  θ = 29.6/7.7 ≈ 3.8

The angle is about 3.8 radians.

Answer:

16inches is your answer

Answer:

3.625h,217.5min,13050sec

Step-by-step explanation:

S=vt

t=S/v

t=435/120 (km) /(km/h) =3.625h

t= 3.625*60 min = 217.5 min

t=217.5*60sec = 13050 sec

Answer:

t= 3.625 gio 217.5 phút = 13.050 giây

Step-by-step explanation:

s= vt

t=s/v

t= 435/120= 3.625 gio

t= 3.625*60=217.5 phút

t=  217.5*60 = 13.050 giây

Answer:

B. The distance of an archer's shots from the center of a target

C. The time it takes for an airliner to fly from Los Angeles to New York

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the Question,

B & C should each have a range of values that cover most occurrences with outlying values that decrease in number as they move further away from the dominant value range, which is the definition of a normal distribution.

The selling price is $129000

The selling price of an item is the price at which it is sold.

Given that 10% of selling price is the commission.

So the family gets 90% of the selling price, which is given as $116,100.

i.e (90/100) * Selling Price = 116100

Therefore, the selling price is  (116100*100)/90 = 129000.

Hence, the family sell the house for the price of  $129,000

To learn more about selling price, use the link given below:

https://brainly.com/question/28017453

#SPJ2

Answer:

4 a+8 ab+8b

Step-by-step explanation:

8 a-4 a+6ab+2ab+5 b+3 b

4 a+8 ab+8b

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation: If I is intial height (y=I-6x) because Height = intial height + numbrt of knots -6 becuase as shown in the table every knot takes away 6 cm.

The linear equation that represents the length of the rope (y) after tying 'x' knots is:  y = f(x) = 88 - 6x

"A linear equation is an equation in which the highest power of the variable is always 1. It is also known as a one-degree equation. The standard form of a linear equation in one variable is of the form Ax + B = 0. Here, x is a variable, 'A' is a coefficient and 'B' is constant".

Here, the number of knots are x = 4, 5, 6, 7, 8.

The length of the rope remains after each knots y = 64, 58, 52, 46, 40.

After tying 5th knot, the length of the rope decreases

= (64 - 58) cm

= 6 cm

After tying 6th knot, the length of the rope decreases

= (58 - 52) cm

= 6 cm

After tying 7th knot, the length of the rope decreases

= (52 - 46) cm

= 6 cm

After tying 5th knot, the length of the rope decreases

= (46 - 40) cm

= 6 cm

Initial length of the rope was = (64 + 4 × 6) cm = 88 cm

With the increase in value of 'x' by 1, the value of 'y' decreases by 6.

Therefore, the required equation: y = f(x) = 88 - 6x

Learn more about a linear equation here: https://brainly.com/question/3269317

#SPJ2

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  6.4

Step-by-step explanation:

The length is found from the distance formula:

  d = √((x2 -x1)² +(y2 -y1)²)

  d = √((-6 -(-2))² +(-1-4)²) = √((-4)² +(-5)²) = √(16 +25) = √41

  d ≈ 6.4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

hope it helps

Step-by-step explanation:

there is something wrong with your question.

there is no parallelogram with 8 and 6 ft side lengths that has an area of 54 ft².

the maximum area of a parallelogram with 8 and 6 ft side lengths is 48 ft². and that is a rectangle 8×6 as a special form of a parallelogram.

the area of any parallelogram is calculated

Ap = base length × height

and height is the length of the line perpendicular to the base line to one of the corners on the opposite side (as long as the base line).

if Ap = 54, and the base length is 8, this means

54 = 8 × height

height = 54/8 = 6.75 ft

but the height can only be the length of a side connected to the base line or less. not longer.

and in our example here, this connected side is 6. so, the height can only be 6 or less. not 6.75.

so, there must be something wrong with your numbers.

once you get the actual numbers, use my approach above with them (replace whatever number is wrong here by the true value).

(B)

Explanation:

[tex](\sec \beta + 1)(\tan \beta \csc \beta - 1)[/tex]

[tex]=\left(\dfrac{1}{\cos\beta} + 1 \right) \left(\dfrac{\sin \beta}{\cos \beta} \dfrac{1}{\sin \beta} - 1 \right)[/tex]

[tex]=\left(\dfrac{1}{\cos\beta} + 1 \right) \left(\dfrac{1}{\cos \beta} - 1 \right)[/tex]

[tex]= \left(\dfrac{1}{\cos^2 \beta} - 1 \right)[/tex]

[tex]= \left(\dfrac{1 - \cos^2 \beta}{\cos^2 \beta} \right)[/tex]

[tex]= \dfrac{\sin^2 \beta}{\cos^2 \beta}[/tex]

[tex]= \tan^2 \beta[/tex]

The confidence interval of the true proportion of low income people who will vote for the introduction of the tax is

Yes, we can conclude that at the 5% level of significance, the proportion of high income voters favoring the new security tax is 10% higher than that of low income voters using Test of Significance for Difference of Proportions.

A confidence interval is the mean of your estimate plus and minus the variation in that estimate.

Proportion of high-income people who will vote for the introduction of the tax = p1 =  [tex]\frac{80}{100} = \frac{4}{5}[/tex][tex]= 0.8[/tex]

Proportion of low-income people who will vote for the introduction of the tax = p2 =  [tex]\frac{55}{80} = \frac{11}{16}[/tex] [tex]= 0.6875[/tex]

95% confidence interval of the true proportion of low income people who will vote for the introduction of the tax -

Upper confidence interval -

[tex]= p + 1.96 \sqrt{pq/n}[/tex]

[tex]=0.6875 + 1.96 \sqrt{(0.6875)(1-0.6875)/80} \\= 0.6875 + 1.96 \sqrt{0.00268} \\=0.789[/tex]

Lower confidence interval -

[tex]= p - 1.96 \sqrt{pq/n}[/tex]

[tex]=0.6875 - 1.96 \sqrt{(0.6875)(1-0.6875)/80} \\= 0.6875 - 1.96 \sqrt{0.00268} \\=0.586[/tex]

Test of Significance for Difference of Proportions is used when we want to compare two distinct populations with respect to the prevalence of a certain attribute, say A, among their members.

n1 = 100

X1 = 80

p1 = 0.8

n2 = 80

X2 = 55

p2 = 0.6875

H0:  the proportion of high-income voters favoring the new security tax is 10% higher than that of low-income voters.(P1 - P2 = 0.1)

H1:  the proportion of high-income voters favoring the new security tax isn't 10% higher than that of low-income voters. (P1 - P2 != 0.1)

[tex]z = \frac{(p1 - p2) - (P1 -P2)}{(\frac{X1+X2}{n1+n2})(1-\frac{X1+X2}{n1+n2})(\frac{1}{n1}+\frac{1}{n2} ) }[/tex]

[tex]z = \frac{(0.8 - 0.6875)- 0.1}{\sqrt{0.75*0.25*0.0225} } \\\\z = \frac{0.0125}{0.0649} \\\\z = 0.1926[/tex]

Since z = 0.1926 < 1.96, null hypothesis cannot be rejected. Thus,  the proportion of high-income voters favoring the new security tax is 10% higher than that of low-income voters.

Learn more about confidence interval here

https://brainly.com/question/24131141

#SPJ2

Answer:

Area of square = Side²

Step-by-step explanation:

The area of a 2-D region, form, or flattened lamina in the planes is the quantity that represents its extent. On the 2-D surface or 3-D object, surface is its counterpart. A shape's area can be calculated by comparing it to squares of a specific size.

Area of square = Side²

Answer:

3x-2x+7=-9

We simplify the equation to the form, which is simple to understand  

3x-2x+7=-9

We move all terms containing x to the left and all other terms to the right.  

+3x-2x=-9-7

We simplify left and right side of the equation.  

+1x=-16

We divide both sides of the equation by 1 to get x.  

x=-16

Step-by-step explanation:

You can't expect to get exactly 2500 out of 5000 tosses more than a few times . You will come pretty close, but that's only good in horseshoes.

Of course I'm answering this on the basis of a computer language and not actually performinig this a million tmes, each part of a million consisting of 5000 tosses.

Simulations and not completely unbiased, but based on experience, 5000 is a very small number and getting 2500 more than a couple of times is unlikely

The probability of flipping a coin

coming up heads and tails is 1/2.

So, toss 5000 times 5000/2= 2500

heads: 2500

tails : 2500

Answer:

Both triangles are triangle rectangles, but the triangles are not similar.

Step-by-step explanation:

By the Pythagorean's theorem, we know that for a triangle rectangle the sum of the squares of the cathetus is equal to the square of the hypotenuse.

Where the cathetus are always the two sides of smaller length.

We also know that two figures are similar if all the correspondent sides are proportional to each other, this means that the figures have the same shape but different size.

First, for triangle A the measures of the sides are:

48, 55, 73

Here the two catheti are 48 and 55, and the hypotenuse is 73.

Then to answer the first question we need to try to apply the Pythagorean's theorem, we should have:

48^2 + 55^2 = 73^2

solving that we get:

5,329 = 5,329

This is true, thus triangle A is a triangle rectangle.

Now for triangle B the measures are: 36, 77 and 85.

So the catheti are 36 and 77, and the hypotenuse is 85

So to check if triangle B is a triangle rectangle the equation:

36^2 + 77^2 = 85^2

must be true, solving both sides we get:

7,225 = 7,225

This is true, so triangle B is a triangle rectangle.

Finally, to check if the figures are similar we need to compare the correspondent sides of both triangles, such that the quotient of correspondent sides must be always the same.

For the hypotenuses, if we compute:

(hypotenuse B)/(Hypotenuse A) we get:

85/73 = 1.16

Now if we do the same for the two smaller catheti we get:

36/48 = 0.75

The quotients are different, thus the triangles are not similar.

Answer:

If cars did not exist people could do as the did before they were invented. Such as walk to where they need to go or use a horse and buggy or carriage.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

7

Step-by-step explanation:

This is correct answer bro...

Answer:

7

Step-by-step explanation:

So first off, two numbers that are to the same root can be combined.

In this case we can combine these two values, since they are to the 5th root and are both 7:

[tex]\sqrt[5]{7*7^4}[/tex]

=

[tex]\sqrt[5]{49^4}[/tex]

This can be broken down into 7^2

This gets us [tex]\sqrt[5]{7^5}[/tex]

Remember that we add exponents, together, so in this case it adds up to 5.

You might be wondering...well if its 7^2 and 7^4, wouldnt it be 7^6?

Well, remember this. One of the 7s in 7^2 is from the 7^4, so tecnically it is 7^3 + 7^2, which is 7^5

Anyway, now we have:

[tex]\sqrt[5]{7^5}[/tex]

When you root a exponent, it works like subtraction.

In this case we have a exponent of 5, and a root of 5.

This is 5-5 = 0

So it will just be 7. Because the square and root cancel each other out, leaving us with 7.

Hope this helps!

Also, I  just watched you waste someone elses answer so you could ask your own question. Instead of wasting other peopes answers, message me on one of my questions or answers, I will help you for free. :D