According to the chapter, the 2009 Credit Card Responsibility and Disclosure Act: requires persons under 21 to show independent income or use a co-signer to acquire a credit card. (B)
The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, also known as the Credit CARD Act of 2009, is a federal statute that was signed into law by President Barack Obama on May 22, 2009.
The act is intended to protect consumers from abusive credit card practices and to improve transparency in the credit card sector.The Credit CARD Act of 2009 is a comprehensive credit card reform law that includes a number of provisions aimed at safeguarding customers from unfair and deceptive practices.
Some of the Credit CARD Act of 2009's key provisions include the following:Credit card issuers must give customers a minimum of 21 days to pay their bills;Credit card issuers must notify customers of changes to their account terms at least 45 days ahead of time;Credit card issuers are prohibited from charging interest on fees and penalties;
Credit card issuers are required to apply payments to high-interest balances first;
Credit card issuers are required to mail monthly statements to customers 21 days prior to their payment due date;
Credit card issuers must provide customers with a notice before increasing their interest rate;
Credit card issuers must provide customers with a warning before assessing an over-limit fee on their account; and
Persons under the age of 21 are required to demonstrate independent income or use a co-signer to acquire a credit card.
To know more about Disclosure Act click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/29546437#
#SPJ11
Eli is a public defender representing his client in a first-degree murder case. Roxy, his client, does not want to make a plea, so the case is going to trial. Eli is preparing to seat the jury and wants the jurors to be able to relate to his client, who grew up poor but started her own business. If a prospective juror states that he believes all women are killers, Eli can ask that the juror be removed by requesting a
Eli can request that the prospective juror be removed from the jury by making a "challenge for cause." A challenge for cause is when a lawyer or party to a case asks the judge to excuse a potential juror due to the juror's beliefs or values, in this case, that "all women are killers." The judge will determine if the prospective juror can still be fair and impartial, and if not, the juror will be dismissed.
A challenge for cause is a request made by an attorney to remove a prospective juror from a trial panel because of a specific reason that shows the juror cannot be fair or impartial. In this case, if a prospective juror states a belief that all women are killers, it could indicate a bias or prejudice against women that could prevent them from being fair and impartial in Roxy's trial. Eli could request a challenge for cause to remove the juror from the panel based on this bias. The judge would then decide whether or not to grant the challenge for cause and remove the juror from the panel.
Learn more about the prospective juror:
https://brainly.com/question/30089719
#SPJ11
pseudocode is written in natural language but often includes programming to assist in writing the program itself.
Pseudocode is a type of informal language that uses natural language to express the logic and structure of a computer program.
It is not a programming language, but rather a tool used by programmers to plan and design their code. Pseudocode is written in a way that is easy to understand by both programmers and non-programmers. It often includes programming concepts and structures, such as conditional statements, loops, and variables, to assist in the process of writing the program. By using pseudocode, programmers can outline the steps of the program, identify potential errors or issues, and refine the logic before starting to write the actual code.
To know more about Pseudocode click here:
brainly.com/question/13208346
#SPJ4
fill in the blank. expansionary fiscal policy will cause gross domestic product to and the interest rate to .
Expansionary fiscal policy will cause gross domestic product to increase and the interest rate to rise.
Expansionary fiscal policy involves increasing government spending and/or reducing taxes, which increases aggregate demand in the economy. This increased demand can lead to higher economic growth and an increase in gross domestic product (GDP).
However, an increase in demand can also lead to higher inflation, which can cause the central bank to raise interest rates in order to cool down the economy and control inflation. As interest rates rise, this can reduce investment and consumption, which can partially offset the positive effects of expansionary fiscal policy on GDP growth.
To know more about fiscal policy click here:
brainly.com/question/27250647
#SPJ4
democracies and kingdoms are similar because both are forms of state systems of political organization in which political offices are ascribed?
Yes, both democracies and kingdoms are forms of state systems of political organization in which political offices are ascribed. In democracies, these offices are elected by the citizens, while in kingdoms, the offices are typically inherited.
Democracies and kingdoms are not the same in terms of their structure, functions, and governance.
Democracy is a government system in which power is vested in the hands of the people. The government in a democracy is established based on the will of the majority of the people. The citizens of the country elect their representatives who govern the country on their behalf. The governing body, in turn, is accountable to the people who elected them. The fundamental principles of democracy include universal suffrage, majority rule, and minority rights.
Kingdom is a government system that has a monarchy as its head. A monarch is a ruler who holds the position for life and passes it on to their heirs. The power to govern the country rests with the monarch. The monarch makes decisions on behalf of the country, without the input or approval of the people. A kingdom's laws are usually derived from religious beliefs, customs, and traditions. A kingdom is divided into provinces, each with its own governor. The governor is accountable to the monarch, and the people have no say in the governance of the province.
Your question is incomplete. The completed version should be as follows:
Is it true that democracies and kingdoms are similar because both are forms of state systems of political organization in which political offices are ascribed?
Learn more about political offices at https://brainly.com/question/29790851
#SPJ11
how does the process for amending state constitutions compare to that of the u.s. constitution?
The process for amending state constitutions varies by state and is typically less rigorous than the process for amending the U.S. Constitution.
The amendment process for the U.S. Constitution requires the approval of two-thirds of both the House of Representatives and the Senate or a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. The state constitutions and the U.S. Constitution are similar in many respects, but they differ in terms of the process for amending them. The process for amending the U.S. Constitution is a more difficult process than the process for amending state constitutions. It is also more difficult to amend the U.S. Constitution than to amend state constitutions.
The U.S. Constitution's amendment process In the United States, amending the Constitution is a difficult and time-consuming process. To amend the Constitution, a proposal must receive the approval of two-thirds of the members of both the House of Representatives and the Senate or a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures.
The state constitutions' amendment process In comparison, the amendment process for state constitutions is less stringent. Depending on the state, the amendment process may be initiated by a petition of a certain number of voters, a majority vote of the state legislature, or by a constitutional convention.
To learn more about Constitutions :
https://brainly.com/question/30189232
#SPJ11
identify the water cycle process causes cloud formation to occur at location a new york state regions test
The water cycle process that causes cloud formation to occur in New York State regions is called "condensation."
Condensation is the process by which water vapor in the air cools and transforms into liquid water, forming tiny droplets that can combine to form clouds. In New York State, condensation occurs when warm, moist air from the Gulf of Mexico collides with cold air from Canada, causing the moisture in the warm air to condense and form clouds.
This process is particularly common in the fall and winter months when cold air masses move down from Canada and collide with warm, moist air from the south, leading to the formation of large, fluffy clouds and often producing snow and other types of precipitation.
To know more about the water cycle, here
https://brainly.com/question/21501059
#SPJ4
What is Virginia Administrative Process Act 2.2-4000?
The Virginia Administrative Process Act 2.2-4000 is a set of guidelines and procedures for Virginia state agencies and the administrative processes they follow.
The Act outlines the methods for developing, adopting, and implementing regulations, as well as hearing and decision-making procedures.
What is the Virginia Administrative Process Act 2.2-4000?The Virginia Administrative Process Act is a set of state laws that govern the operations of Virginia's administrative agencies.
The Act establishes the procedures that state agencies must follow in adopting, developing, and implementing rules and regulations. The Act was enacted in 1981 and is designed to ensure that state agencies operate in a fair and open manner.
It outlines the procedures for public participation in the development of regulations, including opportunities for public comment, public hearings, and judicial review.
It also outlines the methods for enforcing agency decisions and appeals to those decisions.
In summary, the Virginia Administrative Process Act provides a structured process for state agencies to follow in conducting their affairs, ensuring that they operate in an open and fair manner that is consistent with the principles of democratic government.
To know more about Virginia Administrative Process refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/20338178#
#SPJ11
omit meanin taking field notes about a murde rvioctims gunshot wounds which detial shoudl officers omit
The officers should omit any details about the victim's gunshot wounds that are not pertinent to the investigation.It is important to be professional and focus on the facts that can help with the case.
When taking field notes about a murder victim's gunshot wounds, officers should omit the following details: the victim's identity, ethnicity, and gender. A field note is a brief document that captures information about an event or occurrence as it is happening. Field notes are normally taken by researchers to record qualitative data that can be analyzed and interpreted later.
The information that is collected in field notes is expected to be detailed and concise. Field notes can be taken in any setting, including the field, the laboratory, the classroom, or any other location. Field notes are created for the following purposes:
To collect factual data about an event or occurrence as it is happening To record the researcher's observations and thoughts on a particular subject To create a comprehensive account of the events that occurred, in order to provide a reliable record of the situation When taking field notes about a murder victim's gunshot wounds, officers should omit the following details: the victim's identity, ethnicity, and gender.
For more such questions on investigation
https://brainly.com/question/23323608
#SPJ11
fill in the blank. a solution to the free-rider problem is the government's power to___, which is something businesses and individuals___have the power to do.
A solution to the free-rider problem is the government's power to force people to pay for the goods they benefit from, which is something businesses and individuals do not have the power to do.
Anyone who wants others to pay for a public good but intends to use it themselves is considered a free rider; if many people engage in this behavior, the public good may never be provided.
Because free riders try to use the public good without paying for it, markets frequently struggle to produce them.
The free rider issue can be solved by taking steps to ensure that those who use a public good pay for it. Governmental actions, social pressures, and payment collection are examples of such measures—in circumstances where markets have found a way to do so.
Learn more about free-rider problem at:
brainly.com/question/30751078
#SPJ4
For liability to be imposed when negligence is alleged, in many jurisdictions, the injured party must prove that the defendant's act was not only the cause in fact of the injury but also the ____of the injury.a. superseding cause
b. intervening conduct or strict liability
c. misappropriation
d. proximate cause or substantial factor e. none of the other choices are required
For liability to be imposed when negligence is alleged, in many jurisdictions, the injured party must prove that the defendant's act was not only the cause in fact of the injury but also the proximate cause or substantial factor of the injury. Therefore, the correct answer is option D. Proximate cause or substantial factor.
What is negligence? Negligence is the failure of an individual or entity to use reasonable care, resulting in the injury of another person or entity. Negligence may be claimed in a personal injury lawsuit or other types of litigation such as wrongful death, medical malpractice, or product liability cases. Causation is the foundation of a negligence claim. The plaintiff must show that the defendant's actions or failure to act caused the plaintiff's injuries.
The plaintiff must establish both factual and legal causation. Negligence per se is a term used to describe when a defendant breaches a duty of care. Negligence per se occurs when a defendant violates a statute or other legal duty, and the plaintiff is a member of the class of people the statute or legal duty is designed to protect. The proximate cause is an essential component of a negligence claim, which is another term for legal causation.
Legal causation examines the foreseeability of an event and determines whether the defendant's actions were the cause of the plaintiff's injuries. To be legally causal, the defendant's conduct must be the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries.
To know more about negligence is alleged refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14833032#
#SPJ11
what the number of base cases required is always equal to the number of propositions you need to assume to be true in the induction hypothesis?
The number of base cases required is always EQUAL to the number of propositions that you need to assume to be true in the induction hypothesis is a statement regarding mathematical induction.
Mathematical induction is a mathematical proof method that involves establishing a statement about an infinite or finite collection of mathematical objects by verifying that it is true for a particular case known as the base case (n = 1 for example), and then verifying that if it is true for any particular case (n = k), it must be true for the next case (n = k + 1).
In simple words, mathematical induction is used to prove that a statement or property is true for every natural number, or for an infinite set of natural numbers. The process begins with proving the statement to be true for a small, finite value of n, which is called the base case. This base case is then assumed true for some value k, and then it is proven that if the statement is true for k, it must also be true for k+1.
Learn more about mathematical induction at https://brainly.com/question/29503103
#SPJ11
in the civil trial process,______ are the documents by which each party sets his or her initial case before the court. voir dires demurrers discoveries pleadings
In a civil trial, pleadings are the documents by which each party sets his or her initial case before the court. Thus option d is correct.
A civil trial is a type of court proceeding in which one party tries to hold another party responsible for some harm or wrongdoing that has been done, typically through monetary compensation or other forms of relief.
The defendant, or the person being sued, has the chance to present their case in court as well. A civil trial may be heard before a judge or a jury depending on the circumstances.
Pleadings are the documents by which each party sets their initial case before the court. Pleadings generally include a complaint, an answer, and a counterclaim.
Thus, Pleadings are very important in the civil trial process because they set the stage for the rest of the trial.
Learn more about the civil trials here:
https://brainly.com/question/28151628
#SPJ11
Arguments are present in everyday life of many American citizens. Understanding how to decipher an argument helps you understand the context of the arguer and the meaning of what is being said. Therefore, it is imperative to learn how to break down an argument, especially if you have a good professor.
I can confirm that being able to analyze and dissect an argument is an important life skill. Arguments are common in a variety of settings, including the workplace, politics, and personal relationships.
What is meant by Analyze and dissect?Analyze and dissect both refer to the process of separating something into its component parts in order to gain a deeper comprehension of its structure, significance, and purpose. You carefully and critically examine something when you analyze or dissect it, looking for patterns, connections, and relationships between its components. Analyzing or dissecting an argument may involve identifying its main claims, evidence, and reasoning, as well as any biases, assumptions, or fallacies that may be present. Analyzing and dissecting objects aims to gain a more in-depth comprehension of their subject matter so that they can make more informed choices and judgments.
To know more about Critically Examine, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24143106
#SPJ1
Match the British imperial economic policy to the correct definition.*law requiring that all goods imported to or exported from Britain be carried only on British ships*law requiring all shipments of goods from Europe to America to stop in Britain to be taxed*a period of loosely enforced trade restrictions in the American colonies*a political and economic policy enabling the government to take control of all economic activities*mercantilism*Navigation Act of 1651*salutary neglect*Staples Act
Mercantilism defines as a political and economic policy enabling the government to take control of all economic activities.
Navigation Act of 1651 propose that the law requiring that all goods imported to or exported from Britain be carried only on Britain ships.
Salutary neglect describes a period of loosely enforced trade restrictions in the American colonies.
Staples Act means that the law requiring all shipments of goods from Europe to America to stop in Britain to be taxed.
The British government enacted a number of policies to regulate trade, which required that all goods imported to or exported from Britain be carried only on British ships. Through the Staples Act the government would receive a portion of the profits from any trade between the American colonies and Europe.
To learn more about government click here https://brainly.com/question/13540610
#SPJ1
which amendment establishes the direct election of u.s. senators by popular vote?
The election of United States senators was modified by the Seventeenth Amendment, as was the procedure for filling vacancies.
The direct election of United States senators in each state was created by the 17th Amendment (Amendment XVII) to the United States Constitution. The Constitution's Article I, Section 3, Clauses 1 and 2—under which senators were chosen by state legislatures—are repealed by the amendment. Also, it modifies how Senate vacancies are filled, enabling state legislatures to authorize interim appointments by their governors until a special election can be called.
The 62nd Congress introduced the amendment in 1912, and it was ratified by three-quarters (36) of the state legislatures on April 8, 1913, becoming a part of the Constitution.
Learn more about the Seventeenth Amendment,
https://brainly.com/question/8813331
#SPJ4
The opinions expressed in the excerpt are most similar to those of the American Indian Movement in that both groupsA. believed that the United States should not be involved in foreign wars or other entanglementsB. asserted that state and local governments should have more power than the United States governmentC. argued that the United States had a responsibility to provide compensation for past injusticesD. claimed that the United States had a responsibility to enact laws to limit environmental pollution
The opinions expressed are most similar to those of the American Indian Movement in that both groups C. argued that the United States had a responsibility to provide compensation for past injustices.
The excerpt mentions that the United States has a history of mistreating people and that reparations are necessary to right the wrongs of the past. The American Indian Movement similarly argued that the United States government had a responsibility to address the historical injustices committed against Native American people, such as broken treaties and forced relocation. The movement sought to raise awareness of these issues and to push for government action to address them.
While the other options listed in the question may also have been advocated for by one or both of these groups, they are not specifically mentioned in the given excerpt. Therefore, the most accurate answer is C.
Know more about American Indian Movement here:
https://brainly.com/question/863447
#SPJ11
which amendment preserves the right to a trial by jury in civil cases?
Answer:
The Seventh Amendment
Explanation:
select the four control systems that are used in multinational firms.political cultural personal bureaucratic output monetary
Multinational firms need to implement four control systems used in multinational firms are political, cultural, personal, and bureaucratic. Political control is used to control international activities, such as when a government influences a multinational's business operations.
1.Personal control systemIn personal control systems, the top management supervises the activities of the lower-level employees. The management of the multinational firms personally observes the activities of employees to ensure that they are following company policies and regulations.
2. Bureaucratic control systemIn bureaucratic control systems, multinational firms create a set of policies and regulations that employees need to follow. The company establishes standard procedures and monitors employee behavior to ensure that they are following the regulations.
3. Output control systemIn output control systems, multinational firms set specific targets for their employees to meet. The company monitors the employees' performance and productivity to ensure that they are meeting the targets.
4. Monetary control systemIn monetary control systems, multinational firms use financial incentives to motivate employees. The company rewards the employees for their performance and productivity. This control system helps companies to retain employees and motivates them to work harder.
For such more questions on Multinational
https://brainly.com/question/29798384
#SPJ11
which of the following are the three fundamental problems of democracy that political parties solve?
(i) Parties contest elections. (ii)Parties put ahead unique policies and programmes and voters pick out from them. (iii) Parties play a decisive function in making legal guidelines for a country. (iv)Parties structure and run goverments.
What are the three necessary functions of political events in a democratic government?Major functions of the Political Parties are as follows – i Parties contest elections. ii Parties put ahead exceptional policies and programmes. iii Parties play a decisive position in making laws of a country. iv Parties form and run the government.
What are the 3 challenges being faced by means of political parties in India discuss?The three challenges confronted by using political parties in India are: i Lack of inside democracy. ii Challenge of dynastic succession iii Growing role of money and muscle power. iv Often events do not appear to offer a significant choice to the voters.
Learn more about political parties here;
https://brainly.com/question/633543
#SPJ1
De jure discrimination and de facto discrimination are two ways in which some Americans are treated as less equal than others. Examples of public policies designed to address each of these forms of discrimination are
a. affirmative action (de jure), and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (de facto).
b. the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (de jure), and the Brown decision (de facto).
c. the Supreme Court's busing decisions (de jure), and affirmative action decisions (de facto).
d. None of these answers is correct.
e. the Brown decision (de jure), and affirmative action (de facto).
Option A, that is affirmative action (de jure), and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (de facto).
WHAT'S AFFIRMATIVE ACTIONAffirmative action is a public policy that was put in place to correct de jure discrimination that African Americans faced.
This policy was designed to increase the representation of historically marginalized groups in education, employment, and other sectors where they had been previously excluded. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a law that was put in place to address de facto discrimination in the form of voter suppression.
The act was passed to ensure that every citizen of the United States could vote without facing any discrimination. Together, affirmative action and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 are important policies designed to address both de jure and de facto discrimination.
Learn more about affirmative action at
https://brainly.com/question/13609219
#SPJ11
List and explain three reasons for the tremendous growth in the number of crime laboratories in the United States.
There are several reasons for the tremendous growth in the number of crime laboratories in the United States. Here are three possible reasons:
1. Increasing crime rates: The rise in crime rates in the US, particularly in the 1960s and 1970s, led to a growing demand for forensic services to help solve crimes and prosecute offenders. This demand was further fueled by high-profile criminal cases, such as the O.J. Simpson trial, which highlighted the importance of forensic evidence in criminal investigations.
2. Advancements in forensic technology: Advances in forensic technology, such as DNA analysis and digital forensics, have increased the accuracy and reliability of forensic evidence, making it an even more valuable tool for solving crimes. This has led to an increased demand for forensic services and the establishment of specialized crime laboratories to meet this demand.
3. Legal and policy changes: Legal and policy changes, such as the creation of the National Commission on Forensic Science and the passage of the Innocence Protection Act, have increased the scrutiny and standardization of forensic practices, leading to the need for more specialized and accredited crime laboratories to meet these standards. Additionally, the use of forensic evidence in criminal trials has become more prevalent, leading to an increased need for forensic services and crime laboratories to provide this evidence to the courts.
Criteria Of 1. should have cover page 2.should have table of content 3. should have introduction 4. should have conclussion 5. should have reference Assignment
The criteria for a formal report or research paper requires that such work:
1. should have cover page2. should have table of content3. should have introduction4. should have conclusion5. should have referenceWhat is the criteria for a research work?A formal report or research paper should have a cover page that includes the title of the report or paper, the name of the author, the date, and other relevant information. It should also include a table of contents that lists the sections and subsections of the report or paper.
The report or paper should have an introduction that provides background information on the topic, the purpose of the report or paper, and the main points that will be discussed. The report or paper should also have a conclusion that summarizes the main points and provides recommendations or suggestions for further research. Finally, the report or paper should include a reference or works cited page that lists all the sources cited in the report or paper.
Read more about research work
brainly.com/question/26177190
#SPJ1
there are two things you want to remember about bureaucrats. choose the two items that craig mentioned
Two things to remember about bureaucrats are a clear hierarchy and specialization.
A bureaucracy is a sizable administrative organization that manages a government's or society's daily operations. In America, there are three levels of government bureaucracy: federal, state, and local.
A distinct hierarchy, specialization, a division of labor, and a set of formal rules, or standard operating procedures, are the four main characteristics of bureaucracies. There is a distinct hierarchy among bureaucrats, and they specialize, so keep that in mind.
For a bureaucracy to succeed, it needs to be independent, impersonal, and impartial. Employee relationships must be professional, according to Weber. The structure of the impersonal bureaucratic environment encourages making decisions based only on facts and careful consideration.
Learn more about bureaucracy at:
brainly.com/question/2582252
#SPJ4
Which of the following statements are TRUE if a customer signs a durable power of attorney?
I The power of attorney continues in effect if the grantor becomes mentally incompetent II The power of attorney ceases if the grantor becomes mentally incompetent III The power of attorney continues in effect if the grantor dies IV The power of attorney ceases if the grantor dies
A. I and III B. I and IV C. II and III D. II and IV
If a client obtains a durable power of attorney, the following claims are TRUE: If the grantor becomes mentally incompetent, the power of attorney expires and If the grantor passes away, the power of attorney expires. Option D is Correct.
To establish a new account for a single consumer, 4 essential pieces of data must be gathered: Name, Address, Birthdate, and Social Security number. According to Regulation T, the Federal Reserve (also known as the Federal Reserve Board) sets the initial margin for a short margin account at 50%.
The FINRA has set the maintenance margin at 30%. After the principal's passing, in accordance with Section 1A of the Powers of Attorney Act of 1882 (the "POA Act") and Section 201 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872. Option D is Correct.
Learn more about power of attorney Visit: brainly.com/question/20397360
#SPJ4
Importance of finding a balance between person freedome and responsible behaviour
There is a good rea-son as to why we find a balance bet-ween personal freedom & responsible behavior. It prevents deindividuation among the group behavior and the collective behavior since one is able to identify there individual personal responsibility instead of the collective responsibility in there behavior.
There must be a balance between my freedom and responsible social behavior because otherwise life will be chaotic. If I could do what-ever I want and all of us could do what-ever we want, we couldn't live at all or life wo-uld be hell on earth. There is a proper place & time for each person's express-ion of his freedom & it should be main-tained under certain limits & conditions.
To know more about freedom click below:
brainly.com/question/8896822
#SPJ4
Which of the following statements accurately summarizes the reasoning for the decision in baker v. carr (1962) ? O responses because rural districts had fewer people
The correct statement that accurately summarizes the reasoning for the decision in Baker v. Carr (1962) is (A) responses because rural districts had fewer people and (B) representation was unevenly distributed.
The case involved the issue of redistricting and how it affected the distribution of voting power. The plaintiff, Charles Baker, argued that his vote was worth less than those of voters in other districts due to an uneven distribution of population. The Supreme Court held that this issue was a justiciable question and ruled that the district courts had jurisdiction to hear the case. The Court's decision established the principle of "one person, one vote," which requires that each individual's vote should have equal weight in the election process, and paved the way for further redistricting cases to be heard by the courts.
Learn more about Supreme Court :
https://brainly.com/question/10739091
#SPJ1
The complete question is :
Which of the following statements accurately summarizes the reasoning for the decision in baker v. carr (1962) ?
(A) responses because rural districts had fewer people
(B) representation was unevenly distributed
(C) baker was denied equal protection under the law
U.S. firms, their foreign subsidiaries, or foreign firms that are licensees of U.S. technology cannot sell a product to a country in which the sale is considered by the U.S. government to affect theoverall balance of payments of the United States.national security of the United States.relationship of the U.S. with the world community.competitive balance of world trade.competitive balance of free competition inside the U.S.
U.S. technology cannot sell a product without an export licence to a country in the sale is considered by the U.S. government to affect the overall balance of payments of the United States is; National security of the United States.
What is an export license?
An export license is a government document issued by a country's export control agency, authorizing the export of certain goods in specific quantities to a particular destination. An export license is usually required for any items that are controlled, regulated, or banned by national and international export control laws.
The export control agency is responsible for regulating and overseeing all activities related to the export of goods, including granting export licenses and enforcing export regulations.
Why are export licenses necessary?Export licenses are necessary for a variety of reasons, including to: Prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction Protect national security Ensure compliance with international laws and regulations Combat terrorism and other criminal activities Promote economic development and stability.
There are different types of export licenses, and the specific requirements and regulations will depend on the type of goods being exported and the destination country. However, in general, the purpose of an export license is to ensure that the export of certain goods does not pose a threat to national security, international relations, or other important interests.
To know more about Export licenses refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31142028#
#SPJ11
a police officer who walks up and talks to a person standing on the street corner, questioning the person about his drug use, is engaged in
A police officer who walks up and talks to a person standing on the street corner, questioning the person about his drug use, is engaged in what is known as a Terry stop.
A Terry stop is a brief and limited investigative stop, named after the Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio (1968), that allows police officers to temporarily detain and question a person based on reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. The officer may ask the person questions and request identification, but may only conduct a search if he or she has probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed or a weapon is present. Terry stops are intended to help police officers investigate potential criminal activity while respecting the individual's Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures.
To know more about engaged click here:
brainly.com/question/30561114
#SPJ4
true/false. police are allowed to move belongings around under the plain view doctrine if they think that there may be illegal contraband hidden in the house.
The given statement " police are allowed to move belongings around under the plain view doctrine if they think that there may be illegal contraband hidden in the house." is false as the police may not move objects to get a better view, and they may not be in a location unlawfully.
The officer must have reasonable grounds to believe the object is either contraband or evidence of a crime in order to legally seize it. The police may not enter a space illegally or move objects to improve their view.
An officer may seize evidence of a crime that is plainly visible without a warrant under the plain view doctrine, a rule of criminal procedure. This doctrine serves as an exception to the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unwarranted searches and seizures.
The probable cause requirement, however, places restrictions on the plain view doctrine because it allows officers to search or seize items only after they have reasonable grounds to believe they are contraband.
Learn more about plain view doctrine at:
brainly.com/question/28332116
#SPJ4
true or false. testosterone administration induces a red shift in democrats
Answer:
True, testosterone administration induces a red shift in democrats