Alice Paul wanted to make a change to the U.S. Constitution to give women the right to vote in all states.
She suggested the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), a federal amendment that guaranteed that "equality of rights under the law will not be denied or restricted on account of sex by the United States or by any state.
" All women in the country would now have the same legal rights and the ability to vote thanks to this amendment. However, Congress never approved the ERA, and in the end, the 19th Amendment was passed in 1920, granting women the right to vote.
Paul played a crucial role as a leader in the fight for women's suffrage, and her influence is still felt today.
To learn more about Alice Paul visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2396038
#SPJ4
What happened concerning slavery as a result of the Civil War? a. The 13th Amendment abolishes slavery. b. The 12th Amendment abolishes slavery . c. The 10th Amendment abolishes slavery.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
The 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1865 in the aftermath of the Civil War, abolished slavery in the United States.
mark and carolyn blackburn collection of polynesian art/bridgeman images *french national holiday celebrating the 1789 french revolution **french colonial territory in polynesia, the south pacific question which of the following events would have been most likely to produce a cultural context similar to the one depicted in the image? responses a. the spread of marxist ideas b. the taiping rebellion in china c. the scramble for africa d. the unification of germany
The answer to this question is C: the scramble for africa d. the unification of germany
The Scramble for Africa. This event was a period of time during the late 19th century when several European powers competed to claim territories in Africa.
This competition ultimately led to the establishment of numerous French colonial territories in Africa, which then spread to the Polynesian region of the South Pacific.
The Scramble for Africa, and the subsequent French colonization, would have created a cultural context similar to the one depicted in the image.
TO KNOW ABOUT Scramble:
https://brainly.com/question/30108695
#SPJ11
Woodrow Wilson's early efforts to conduct a strongly anti-imperialist US foreign-policy we're first undermined when he
Woodrow Wilson's anti-imperialist US foreign policy was essentially based on the belief that the United States should help other nations to advance their causes, not exploit them for American purposes. During his presidency, Wilson tried to break down the barriers between the United States and other countries by promoting democracy and protecting human rights in other countries.The occupation of Haiti is considered by many to be a failure of Wilson's anti-imperialist policy, as it represented a flagrant disregard for the sovereignty of another nation.
He believed that American democracy should be shared with the rest of the world and that the United States should be a leader in international politics.Why did Wilson's efforts to conduct a strongly anti-imperialist US foreign-policy fail?Wilson's efforts to conduct a strongly anti-imperialist US foreign-policy were undermined when he sent troops to occupy Haiti. The United States invaded Haiti in 1915 with the stated goal of restoring order and preventing German influence from taking hold in the country. The United States occupied Haiti for almost two decades, with Wilson's administration overseeing the establishment of a new constitution and the government's administration. The occupation of Haiti is considered by many to be a failure of Wilson's anti-imperialist policy, as it represented a flagrant disregard for the sovereignty of another nation.
For more such questions on US foreign policy
https://brainly.com/question/15747651
#SPJ11
Under the Articles of Confederation, the years between 1781 and 1787 are often ... The national government was too weak to solve the nation's problems.colonies were forced to pay high reparations to England.states were fighting the French and Indian War.southern states threatened to secede from the Union over the issue of slavery.central government lacked the power to deal with major problems.
Answer:
Under the Articles of Confederation, the years between 1781 and 1787 are often characterized by the fact that the central government lacked the power to deal with major problems. The Articles of Confederation created a weak central government that had limited powers and relied on the states to carry out most functions of government. The national government lacked the power to levy taxes, regulate trade, or raise an army, among other things. This meant that the government was unable to effectively address many of the nation's problems, including economic issues, national defense, and foreign relations. As a result, the government was largely ineffective, and the nation struggled to maintain stability and unity under the Articles of Confederation. This led to the Constitutional Convention of 1787, which drafted the United States Constitution and created a stronger federal government with more powers to address the nation's problems.
(please could you kindly mark my answer as brainliest)
devolution expresses itself in balkanization. this was most clearly seen in yugoslavia when a. the kingdom of serbia marged in 1918b. the kingdom of serbiarenamed it self the kingdom of yugoslavia in 1929
Devolution expresses itself in Balkanization. This was most clearly seen in Yugoslavia when the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was created in 1963. Therefore, the correct answer is E.
Devolution is the procedure of shifting power from a central government to a regional or sub-national government, giving local areas more power and responsibility to run their affairs. As a consequence, devolution has often resulted in a gradual loss of central authority in government.
Devolution and Balkanization are two closely related phenomena. Balkanization refers to the fragmentation or division of a region or state into smaller, often hostile states or regions that are unable to coexist peacefully. The term "Balkanization" is derived from the Balkans, a region in southeastern Europe that has experienced a lot of conflict, fragmentation, and division over time.
During the late 1980s and early 1990s, devolution and Balkanization came together in Yugoslavia, resulting in the dissolution of the country into smaller independent states. The Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia dissolved into the following independent states: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Kosovo, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia, and Slovenia.
Your question seems incomplete. The completed version should be as follows:
Devolution expreses itself in Balkanization. This was most clearly seen in Yugoslavia when_______________.
A. the Kingdom of Serbia merged in 1918B. the Kingdom of Serbia renamed itself the Kingdom of Yugoslavia in 1929C. the Axis powers invaded Yugoslavia in 1941D. the monarchy in Yugoslavia was created during World War IIE. the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was created in 1963Learn more about devolution at https://brainly.com/question/29525849
#SPJ11
Unit 3 Mythology and Folklore Critical Thinking Questions
Please answer the following questions using complete sentences, also please make sure to ANSWER THE QUESTIONS FULLY AND COMPLETELY:
1. Would you say that those characters were destined to become heroes, or do you believe being heroic was primarily a matter of choices they made and that anyone could become a hero? Explain your answer using examples.
2. The shapeshifter and the villain/shadow archetypes are both trying to stop or even kill the hero and prevent him from carrying out his destiny. Which archetype is a bigger obstacle for a hero? Why?
3. The heroes of myths and legends often must face threshold guardians in order to advance on their journey. How does this parallel real life? What are some threshold guardians you have had to face to advance on your journey?
I believe that becoming a hero is primarily a matter of the choices one makes, rather than being destined to become one.
What is the Mythology?While some characters in mythology and folklore may have been born with certain traits or abilities that helped them become heroes, ultimately it was their actions and decisions that led to their heroic status. For example, in the Greek myth of Perseus, he was born with divine lineage and given special weapons and tools, but it was his bravery and cunning in defeating the Gorgon Medusa and saving Andromeda that made him a hero.
I think that the villain/shadow archetype is a bigger obstacle for a hero, because they are actively working against the hero's goals and can be more difficult to overcome. The shapeshifter archetype may be more unpredictable and deceitful, but they can also be allies or sources of wisdom for the hero. In contrast, the villain is usually a more straightforward enemy who will stop at nothing to defeat the hero. For example, in the story of Snow White, the Evil Queen is the primary villain who seeks to kill Snow White and prevent her from becoming the rightful heir to the kingdom.
Therefore, In real life, we often face threshold guardians or obstacles that challenge us on our journey towards our goals. These guardians may take the form of societal norms or expectations, personal fears or doubts, or physical barriers. For example, a threshold guardian for someone pursuing a career in the arts may be the pressure to conform to mainstream tastes or the difficulty of finding financial stability. Someone pursuing a physical challenge like climbing a mountain may face weather conditions or technical difficulties that act as threshold guardians. In my own life, I have faced threshold guardians in the form of self-doubt and anxiety, which have made it difficult to take risks or pursue new opportunities.
Learn more about Mythology from
https://brainly.com/question/25098680
#SPJ1
NEED HELP ASAP
Group: African-Americans
1. Who is the group and what civil liberties are they being denied?
2. How can the group persuade the general public to support them?
3. How can their issue be solved?
4. Do you agree that this group should fight for these civil liberties?
5. What other methods might the group use to help ensure they receive their civil liberties?
6. What Constitutional Articles or Amendments are at stake?
Answer:
1.) African-Americans have historically been denied many civil liberties, including the right to vote, access to education, and equal treatment under the law. They have also faced systemic racism, discrimination, and violence, particularly in areas such as housing, employment, and law enforcement.
2.) One way the African-American community can persuade the general public to support them is through peaceful protests and demonstrations, utilizing social media to raise awareness, and engaging in dialogue with community leaders and elected officials. Building strong alliances and coalitions with other marginalized groups can also help amplify their voices.
3.) Solving the issue of civil liberties for African-Americans will require a multi-faceted approach, including reforming policies and practices that perpetuate racism and discrimination, providing greater access to education and economic opportunities, and creating systemic changes in law enforcement and criminal justice.
4.) Yes, they deserve the right to fight for their own civil liberties because every human deserves civil liberties. It would be ethically and morally incorrect for anyone to deny them their civil liberties.
5.) In addition to peaceful protests and building alliances, other methods the African-American community can use to help ensure they receive their civil liberties include voter registration drives, letter-writing campaigns, and legal action, such as filing lawsuits or supporting civil rights organizations.
6.) The Constitutional Amendments at stake for African-Americans include the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, which abolished slavery, granted equal protection under the law, and guaranteed the right to vote regardless of race, respectively.
How does Alexander Hamilton's life in politics compare to the lives of political leaders today?
Answer:
Alexander Hamilton was one of the founding fathers of the United States and played a crucial role in shaping the country's political and economic systems. His life in politics was vastly different from the lives of political leaders today in several ways.
Firstly, the political landscape during Hamilton's time was vastly different from today. Hamilton lived during a time when the United States was still a young nation and was still establishing its political institutions. Political parties had not yet formed, and the country's political leaders were still defining the role of government in society.
Secondly, Hamilton's personal background and experience were vastly different from most political leaders today. Hamilton was born in the Caribbean and did not come from a wealthy or influential family. He worked his way up through the ranks of society and eventually became a trusted advisor to George Washington and one of the most influential voices in the early American government.
Thirdly, the way that Hamilton conducted himself in politics was also different from many political leaders today. He was known for his sharp intellect and his willingness to engage in political debates, but he was also known for his sense of honor and integrity. He was not afraid to speak his mind, but he also believed in the importance of compromise and was willing to work with his political opponents to find common ground.
In many ways, Hamilton's life in politics was a reflection of the unique circumstances of his time. However, his legacy has endured, and he is still considered one of the most important figures in American history. While the political landscape has changed dramatically since his time, many of the values and principles that Hamilton embodied still resonate with political leaders today.
I hope that helps, please don't forget to give a Brainliest :) any feedback is appreciated. Hope you have a great day!
in what way was vietnamization a result of the american public’s frustration with the escalation of forces in vietnam?
"Vietnamization was a result of the American public’s frustration with the escalation of forces in Vietnam to end U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War."
Vietnamization was a policy of the Rich-ard Nixon admin-istration to end U.S. involve-ment in the Vietnam War through a pro-gram to "expand, equip, & train South Vietnam-ese forces and assign to them an ever-increasing comb-at role, at the same time stead-ily reducing the num-ber of U.S. combat troops".
The Vietnam-ization plan provided for a gradual, phased with-drawal of American combat forces, combi-ned with an expanded effort to train & equip South Vietnam to take over mili-tary responsibility for its own defense.
To know more about Vietnam War click below:
brainly.com/question/5399403
#SPJ4
argentina once had an economy with gdp per capita larger than japan, south korea, and spain. however, since 1900 it has largely failed to grow. the story of argentina highlights how growth is over time and may happen in leaps and spurts. please choose the correct answer from the following choices, and then select the submit answer button. answer choices always nonexistent always linear always constant not always constant
Argentina once had an economy with GDP per capita larger than japan, south Korea, and Spain .The correct answer is "not always constant".
The case of Argentina's economy illustrates that economic growth is not always constant over time, and can instead occur in fits and starts. While Argentina was once a prosperous and growing economy, it has since struggled to maintain that level of growth due to a variety of factors, including political instability, economic mismanagement, and external shocks such as commodity price fluctuations and global financial crises. This highlights the fact that economic growth is a complex and multifaceted process that is influenced by a wide range of internal and external factors, and is not always predictable or constant over time.
To know more about economic growth , visit :
https://brainly.com/question/11679822
#SPJ1
what was the name of the treaty in 1915 the allies promised italy the dalmatian coast, in an effort to convince italy to join the allies after it renounced the triple alliance?
The Treaty of London was signed in 1915 between Italy and the Allied Powers. The treaty promised Italy the Dalmatian Coast in exchange for joining the Allied Powers after Italy renounced the Triple Alliance.
The name of the treaty in 1915 that the allies promised Italy the Dalmatian coast is the Treaty of London. Italy initially planned to remain neutral, but when the war began, it had to decide whether to support its ally Austria-Hungary or to take part in the conflict alongside France and the United Kingdom.
The Treaty of London was the document that persuaded Italy to join the Allies after it had abandoned the Triple Alliance. The treaty promised Italy a share of the Central Powers' colonies and a region on the Adriatic coast of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, including the Dalmatian coast, if the Allies emerged victorious in the war.
Why was the Treaty of London significant?
The Treaty of London promised Italy a share of the Central Powers' colonies and a region on the Adriatic coast of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, including the Dalmatian coast, if the Allies emerged victorious in the war. The treaty was significant in that it enabled Italy to leave the Triple Alliance, which it had joined in 1882, and join the Allies.
The treaty enabled Italy to achieve some of its objectives, such as expanding its territory and consolidating its control over the Italian population in Dalmatia. As a result of the treaty, Italy declared war on Austria-Hungary on May 23, 1915.
Learn more about Treaty of London here:
brainly.com/question/11685952
#SPJ11
Can somebody explain to me what this text is saying (summarize)
The text is saying that the world is currently facing a choice between two ways of life - one where the majority has a say and one where a minority forces their will on the majority. The United States believes in supporting free peoples who resist being conquered by minority groups or outside pressures, and the free peoples of the world rely on US support to maintain their freedoms.
The United States and Spain declared war on each other shortly after:
A. the U.S. military invaded Guam and the Philippines.
OB. the USS Maine was attacked in Havana Harbor.
C. Cuba declared its independence from Spain.
D. a U.S. newspaper reported on Spanish atrocities in Cuba.
The United States and Spain declared war on each other shortly after: he USS Maine was attacked in Havana Harbor. Option B
When did The United States and Spain declared war on each other?The USS Maine was a U.S. battleship that exploded in Havana Harbor on February 15, 1898, killing 266 American sailors. At the time, tensions were high between the U.S. and Spain over Spain's colonial rule of Cuba. The incident was widely reported in U.S. newspapers, which attributed the explosion to a Spanish mine. The U.S. government demanded that Spain immediately withdraw from Cuba, and when Spain refused, the U.S. Congress declared war on Spain on April 25, 1898.
The war, known as the Spanish-American War, lasted for four months and ended with a U.S. victory, resulting in Spain ceding control of Cuba, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines to the United States.
Learn more about Havana Harbor at https://brainly.com/question/24792579
#SPJ1
What happens when the president makes a treaty with another nation? The treaty must be approved by 51 percent of the US population. The treaty must be approved by a two-thirds vote of Congress. The treaty is sent to government agencies for approval. The treaty goes into effect once it is signed by the president. PLEASE HELP QUICK
Answer: 2/3 of congress
Explanation:
Answer:
B! The treaty must be approved by a two-thirds vote of Congress.
Explanation:
which river was so badly polluted that it caught fire several times?
The Cuyahoga River in Cleveland, Ohio, which empties into Lake Erie, was so contaminated that it caught fire! When a blowtorch spark ignited floating trash and lubricants, the first fire started in 1936. The river caught fire multiple times more over the following 30 years.
What ignited the Cuyahoga River?Given its contribution to the environmental movement, the Cuyahoga River is now recognized as an American Heritage River. The Ohio State Scenic River's upper 25 miles have exceptional water quality. Although the bottom half is substantially healthier than it was decades ago, it is nonetheless impacted by the Clean Water Act. Railroad bridges next to Republic Steel caught debris in the river, causing it to build up. The water's flammability was increased by the oil on it. The debris was probably ignited by a flare thrown from an overpassing train. The river was one of the most contaminated waterways in the nation. The river was covered in a foot of oil after 100 years of unchecked factory waste disposal.To learn more about Cuyahoga River, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/3887303
The point of view in the excerpt best supports which of the following historical arguments about United States involvement in the First World War before 1917 ?
Answer:
Explanation:
war is a war and sir syed is sir syed
How did General Grant’s total war strategy affect the presidential election of 1864?
It made Lincoln a popular candidate for the Democratic Party, which approved of Grant’s strategy.
It allowed Sherman to capture Atlanta, which increased Lincoln’s popularity in the election.
It horrified many voters in the North, who decided to support Andrew Johnson instead of Lincoln.
It lost Lincoln support among abolitionists, who wanted him to focus on freeing enslaved workers instead.
Answer:
It made people become more wearier and tink carefully to pick someone higghly intellingent
Explanation:
Why does the U.S. Senate vote on appointments to the president's cabinet?
A.
to provide a check on the power of the legislative branch
B.
to ensure that the president appoints members of his own party
C.
to provide a check on the power of the executive branch
D.
to ensure that citizens' voices are heard through their voting
The 15 executive department heads make up the Cabinet, an advisory body. The members of the Cabinet are frequently the President's closest allies and are chosen by the President and ratified by the Senate.
Why does the U.S. Senate vote on appointments to the president's cabinet?
Throughout the previous 200 years, the Senate has only formally rejected a small number of cabinet nominees. From 1925 and 1989, a 64-year span, there was only one refusal. On June 19, 1959, it took place.
The Senate retains the following authorities for its own use: It confirms the President's appointments with a majority vote and ratifies treaties with a two-thirds supermajority. Ratification of trade agreements and the confirmation of the Vice President both require the House of Representatives' approval.
Positions for PAs (around 400 positions): appointments made by the president that are not subject to Senate confirmation. These are high-level posts, including those in the President's Executive Office such as top advisors and aides in the White House.
Learn more about president's cabinet:
https://brainly.com/question/19817479
#SPJ1
One effect of the publication of Uncle Tom's Cabin was
A. an increased interest in abolition.
B. the passage of the Missouri Compromise.
C. the birth of the Republican Party.
D.an attack on a southern armory.
A. an increased interest in abolition.
nelson mandela was the first black president of south africatrue or false
Answer:true
Explanation:
The African National Congress won a 63 percent share of the vote at the election, and Mandela, as leader of the ANC, was inaugurated on 10 May 1994 as the country's first Black President, with the National Party's F.W. de Klerk as his first deputy and Thabo Mbeki as the second in the Government of National Unity
A free-enterprise system uses a _________________ economy
(U.S. Government and Economics)
Answer:
A free-enterprise system uses a capitalist economy.
In your own words, summarize what happened to Fannie on august 31, 1962
Fannie Lou Hamer was a Black American woman who grew up in the segregated South and became a prominent civil rights activist in the 1960s.
What is the story about?Fannie Lou Hamer, a civil rights activist, gave a powerful testimony before the Credentials Committee of the Democratic National Convention on August 22, 1964, in Atlantic City, New Jersey. She shared her experience of being brutally beaten and arrested for her efforts to register to vote in Mississippi.
Therefore, Hamer also spoke about the systemic discrimination and violence that Black Americans faced in the South and called for a more inclusive and democratic society. Her testimony helped to galvanize support for the civil rights movement and bring attention to the issue of voter suppression.
Learn more about voting from
https://brainly.com/question/1330417
#SPJ1
Fannie Lou Hamer (1917-1977)
Testimony Before the Credentials Committee, Democratic National Convention
Atlantic City, New Jersey - August 22, 1964
Fannie Lou Hamer, a leader of the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party, speaks before the Credentials Committee of the Democratic National Convention in Atlantic City, August 22, 1964. (AP Photo/stf)
Fannie Lou Hamer's life took a dramatic turn the day she showed up for a mass meeting to learn about voting. It was August 1962 and Hamer, who was forty-four years old, wasn't even sure what a "mass meeting" was. "I was just curious to go, so I did," she said.1 The meeting was organized by the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) and Hamer was told something she'd never heard before: black people had the right to vote.
One of twenty children born to a family of sharecroppers in the Mississippi Delta, Hamer grew up picking cotton and cutting corn and attended school through the sixth grade. She married a fellow sharecropper and the two scratched out a living doing hard, menial work on a plantation near Ruleville, Mississippi.
According to biographer Sina Dubovoy, when Hamer heard SNCC's presentation, she asked herself, "What did she really have? Not even security." A lynching in a nearby town in 1904 had terrorized blacks then, and the ever-present KKK still kept them quiet. As Dubovoy notes, "The Mississippi Delta was the world's most oppressive place to live if you were black."2 Hamer decided on the spot to register to vote. On August 31, 1962, she boarded a bus to Indianola with seventeen others to try to register to vote. The next day she was kicked off the plantation where she had lived and worked for eighteen years. Her husband lost his job, too.
Hamer immediately went to work as a field organizer for SNCC. Returning home from a training workshop in June 1963, Hamer's bus was intercepted by policemen. She and two others were taken to jail in Winona, Mississippi, and mercilessly beaten. Hamer suffered permanent damage to her kidneys. After recovering from her injuries, she traveled across the U.S. telling her story. With her genuine, plainspoken style, Hamer raised more money for SNCC than any other member.
In 1964, with the support of the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party (MFDP), Hamer ran for Congress. The incumbent was a white man who had been elected to office twelve times. In an interview with the Nation, Hamer said, "I'm showing the people that a Negro can run for office." The reporter observed: "Her deep, powerful voice shakes the air as she sits on the porch or inside, talking to friends, relatives and neighbors who drop by on the one day each week when she is not campaigning. Whatever she is talking about soon becomes an impassioned plea for a change in the system that exploits the Delta Negroes. 'All my life I've been sick and tired,' she shakes her head. 'Now I'm sick and tired of being sick and tired.'"3
SNCC had formed the MFDP to expand black voter registration and challenge the legitimacy of the state's all-white Democratic Party. MFDP members arrived at the 1964 Democratic National Convention intent on unseating the official Mississippi delegation or, failing that, getting seated with them. On August 22, 1964, Hamer appeared before the convention's credentials committee and told her story about trying to register to vote in Mississippi. Threatened by the MFDP's presence at the convention, President Lyndon Johnson quickly preempted Hamer's televised testimony with an impromptu press conference. But later that night, Hamer's story was broadcast on all the major networks.
In your own words, summarize what happened to Fannie on august 31, 1962
an american politician and attorney who is the 49th and current vice president of the us. she is the first female and first african american vp, who is she?
American politician and lawyer who is the 49th Vice President of the United States and the current Vice President. She's the first woman, the first black VP, Kamala Harris.
Kamala D. Harris is Vice President of the United States. After being elected San Francisco District Attorney, California Attorney General, and United States Senator, she served in public service for the rest of her life before she was elected Vice President. Vice President Harris and sister Maya Harris took inspiration from their mother Shyamala Gopalan. A breast cancer researcher and pioneer himself, Gopalan received his doctorate the same year Vice President Harris was born.
Her parents were activists who instilled in Vice President Harris a strong sense of justice. They took her into her civil rights movement and introduced her to role models, from her Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall to civil rights activist Constance Baker Motley.
Married Douglas Emhoff in 2014. They have a large mixed-race family that includes children Ella and Cole.
Know more about Kamala Harris here:
https://brainly.com/question/30854057
#SPJ4
Would impeaching and convicting the President on these charges set a dangerous precedent and make future Presidents unable to carry out their duties? Or would conviction give Congress the necessary power to limit future attempts by Presidents to exercise too much power?
The decision to impeach and convict President rests with Congress, which must weigh the evidence and determine whether the charges rise to the level of high crimes and misdemeanors.
What are crimes?Crimes are acts that are considered illegal and punishable by law. These acts can range from minor offenses such as traffic violations to more serious crimes such as murder, theft, and fraud. Crimes are typically classified into different categories based on their severity, such as misdemeanors or felonies. Misdemeanors are considered less serious offenses and are typically punished with fines or short-term imprisonment, while felonies are more serious and can result in longer prison sentences, probation, or even the death penalty. Some other common types of crimes include drug offenses, assault, sexual offenses, and white-collar crimes such as embezzlement or insider trading. The specific laws and punishments for different crimes vary depending on the country or jurisdiction where they occur.
To learn more about crimes, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30137809
#SPJ1
Explain, briefly, why Muslims and Hindus in India did not get along. Use complete sentences in your answer.
Answer:
Ziaur Rahman Azmi says that the reason behind Hindus' negative perception of Islam is mostly the spread of Sufism in India, as he believes Sufism "distorts" the Islamic ideas of Risalat and Tawheed. He claims Sufism includes idolatry, pointing to Sufi mausoleums and the practices of Tawaf and Sijda that occur at them.
Explanation:
The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 was designed to solve the following personnel management weaknesses in the U.S. Civil Service except:A. lack of clear mechanisms and principles for performance appraisalB. existence of "protected employment"C. excessive presidential control over the Civil Service CommissionD. a lack of standardization and professionalization by the U.S. government in how it conducts collective bargaining with its employees
The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 was designed to solve the following personnel management weaknesses in the U.S. Civil Service EXCEPT for excessive presidential control over the Civil Service Commission. Therefore, the correct answer is C.
The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 is a United States federal law that governs the civil service of the federal government. The Civil Service Reform Act was passed in 1978 to improve the efficiency of the federal bureaucracy and to improve overall government services. The Civil Service Reform Act covers civil service employees in the executive branch of the federal government.
The primary objective of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 was to solve several personnel management problems in the US Civil Service. Some of these problems include the lack of clear mechanisms and principles for performance appraisal, the existence of "protected employment," and a lack of standardization and professionalization by the US government in how it conducts collective bargaining with its employees.
Learn more about Civil Service Reform Act at https://brainly.com/question/6698274
#SPJ11
How would President Franklin Roosevelt most likely respond to Father Charles Coughlin concerns
about the Works Progress Administration (WPA)?
A. President Roosevelt would listen to the criticism and assure Father Coughlin that the money was
benefiting the nation as a whole by helping the working people.
B. President Roosevelt would agree with Father Coughlin taxation was necessary for the recovery of
the country but private industries must also contribute.
C. President Roosevelt would explain to Father Coughlin that the use of public tax money benefits
industry and commerce as well as individuals.
President Roosevelt would address Father Coughlin's concerns by reducing the taxes used to
support the relief and recovery efforts.
Based on his previous responses to criticism, President Franklin Roosevelt would most likely respond to Father Charles Coughlin's concerns about the Works Progress Administration (WPA) by listening to the criticism and addressing it with a diplomatic approach. Option A is the most likely response from Roosevelt. He was known for being a skilled communicator and for being able to persuade his critics by acknowledging their concerns and explaining how his policies would benefit the country as a whole. He would likely emphasize how the WPA was providing jobs and economic stimulus to the working people, and how this was helping to lift the country out of the Great Depression. Option B is a possibility, but Roosevelt would also argue that private industries were already contributing through taxes and other measures. Option C is also a possibility, but Roosevelt would likely emphasize the benefits of the WPA to individuals and communities, rather than just industry and commerce. Option D is unlikely, as Roosevelt believed that government spending was necessary to stimulate the economy and provide relief to those in need.
in which historical period was death disgusting, abnormal, and never discussed? mid-twentieth century 1990s to the present eighteenth and nineteenth centuries middle ages
The middle of the twentieth century was a time in history when talking about death was frowned upon, regarded as aberrant, and generally avoided.
What is the controversial topic of death?the idea that talking or even thinking about death is so harmful and upsetting that one should not just avoid contact with the dead, the dying, and the newly bereaved.
Why is it taboo to talk about death?Despite their inevitableness, death and dying have always been taboo subjects in Western society. They frequently evoke sentiments of panic and fear, which are furthered by horrifying imagery, visuals, and artwork.
To know more about history visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/2289589
#SPJ1
how did the bubonic plague have a positive impact on european civilizations?
the plague brought benefits as well: modern labor movements, improvements in medicine and a new approach to life. Indeed, much of the Italian Renaissance—even Shakespeare's drama to some extent—is an aftershock of the Black Death.
Democratic-Republicans Federalists(1) (2)Preferred a weak federal government Hoped to create a national bankWhich pair of phrases best completes this table comparing the Democratic-Republican and Federalist parties?A. (1) Refused to participate in the War of 1812; (2) Was supported by rich merchantsB. (1) Was supported by rich merchants; (2) Strictly interpreted the ConstitutionC. (1) Wanted closer ties to France; (2) Called for a larger national armyD. (1) Was supported by poor farmers; (2) Demanded equal rights for
D. (1) Was supported by poor farmers; (2) Demanded equal rights for all.
The Democratic-Republicans believed in a weaker federal government with more power given to the states.
They also supported a strict interpretation of the Constitution and were more likely to be supported by farmers and laborers. They opposed the creation of a national bank and other policies that favored wealthy merchants and businessmen.
On the other hand, the Federalists believed in a stronger federal government and were more likely to be supported by wealthy merchants and business owners. They believed that a strong central government was necessary to promote economic growth and national security. They also supported a loose interpretation of the Constitution and the creation of a national bank to stabilize the economy.
Overall, the differences between the two parties reflected a larger debate over the role of government in American society, with the Democratic-Republicans favoring a more decentralized government that prioritized individual liberties and the Federalists favoring a more centralized government that prioritized economic and national security.
To know more about federal government click here:
brainly.com/question/20083762
#SPJ4