Are the given functions y1 and y2 linearly independent or linearly dependent on the interval (0, 1) and why? Choose the correct statement below. Yi = cscº(t) - cot? (t), y2 = 9a. Since yi = - 42 on (0, 1), the functions are linearly independent on (0,1). b. Since yı = 5y2 on (0,1), the functions are linearly independent on (0,1). c. Since yı = 3y2 on (0,1), the functions are linearly dependent on (0,1). d. Since yi = - Žy2 on (0, 1), the functions are linearly dependent on (0,1).

Answer:

A = 32 ft²

Step-by-step explanation:

the area (A ) of a square is calculated as

A = s² ( s is the side length )

the diagonal divides the square into 2 right triangles

using Pythagoras' identity on the lower right triangle with hypotenuse 8 and sides s , then

s² + s² = 8²

2s² = 64 ( divide both sides by 2 )

s² = 32

Then

A = s² = 32 ft²

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

348.55

Answer: 6 apple pies and 4 shoo-fly pies were made.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's assume the number of apple pies made is A, and the number of shoo-fly pies made is S.

We know that there were 8 slices in each apple pie, so the total number of apple pie slices would be 8A. Similarly, the total number of shoo-fly pie slices would be 10S.

We also know that the total number of slices available was 84. So we can write an equation:

8A + 10S = 84

We have two unknowns and only one equation, so we need another equation to solve for A and S. We know that the siblings made a total of 10 pies. So we can write another equation:

A + S = 10

Now we have two equations and two unknowns, so we can solve for A and S. We can use substitution to eliminate one variable:

A + (10 - A) = 10

10 = 2A + 10

2A = 0

A = 0

This is obviously not the solution we're looking for, so there must be an error in our calculations. Let's check our first equation:

8A + 10S = 84

If A = 0, then we have:

10S = 84

S = 8.4

This is also not a valid solution since we can't make 8.4 shoo-fly pies. The mistake we made was assuming that both A and S were whole numbers. We can fix this by using another equation:

A + S = 10

We know that A and S are both whole numbers and that A + S = 10. The only pairs of whole numbers that add up to 10 are (1, 9), (2, 8), (3, 7), (4, 6), and (5, 5).

Let's try each pair and see which one gives us a valid solution:

(1, 9): 8(1) + 10(9) = 98 (not 84)

(2, 8): 8(2) + 10(8) = 96 (not 84)

(3, 7): 8(3) + 10(7) = 94 (not 84)

(4, 6): 8(4) + 10(6) = 92 (not 84)

(5, 5): 8(5) + 10(5) = 90 (not 84)

None of the pairs work, which means there is no valid solution that uses whole numbers for A and S.

However, we can use decimals to get a solution that's close to the desired number of slices. Let's try (4.2, 5.8):

8(4.2) + 10(5.8) = 84.4 (close to 84)

This means that the siblings made 4.2 apple pies and 5.8 shoo-fly pies. Since we can't make a fraction of a pie, we'll round up the number of apple pies and round down the number of shoo-fly pies:

4 apple pies and 5 shoo-fly pies would give us a total of 8(4) + 10(5) = 84 slices, which is the desired number.

The probability of all will fail is the lowest.

The given problem states that a missile guidance system has seven fail-safe components, and the probability of each failing is 0.2. The given variable is binomial. We need to find the following probabilities:

(a) Exactly two will fail.

(b) More than two will fail.

(c) All will fail.

(d) Compare the answers for parts a, b, and c, and explain why these results are reasonable.

(a) Exactly two will fail.

The probability of exactly two will fail is given by;

P(exactly two will fail) = (7C2) × (0.2)2 × (0.8)5
= 21 × 0.04 × 0.32768
= 0.2713

Therefore, the probability of exactly two will fail is 0.2713.

(b) More than two will fail.

The probability of more than two will fail is given by;

P(more than two will fail) = P(X > 2)
= 1 - P(X ≤ 2)
= 1 - (P(X = 0) + P(X = 1) + P(X = 2))
= 1 - [(7C0) × (0.2)0 × (0.8)7 + (7C1) × (0.2)1 × (0.8)6 + (7C2) × (0.2)2 × (0.8)5]
= 1 - (0.8)7 × [1 + 7 × 0.2 + 21 × (0.2)2]
= 1 - 0.2097152 × 3.848
= 0.1967

Therefore, the probability of more than two will fail is 0.1967.

(c) All will fail.

The probability of all will fail is given by;

P(all will fail) = P(X = 7) = (7C7) × (0.2)7 × (0.8)0
= 0.00002

Therefore, the probability of all will fail is 0.00002.

(d) Compare the answers for parts a, b, and c, and explain why these results are reasonable.

The probability of exactly two will fail is the highest probability, followed by the probability of more than two will fail. And, the probability of all will fail is the lowest probability. These results are reasonable since the more the number of components that fail, the less likely it is to happen. Therefore, it is reasonable that the probability of exactly two will fail is higher than the probability of more than two will fail, and the probability of all will fail is the lowest.

Learn more about Probability

brainly.com/question/23017717

#SPJ11

The error bound for the 95% confidence interval is (1.96 x Standard Deviation/√n), which in this case is (1.96 x 11/√50) = 2.56. This means that the true mean weight of newborn elephant calves lies within +/-2.56 pounds of the interval range.

The 95% confidence interval for the population mean weight of newborn elephants can be calculated using the sample mean of 244 pounds and the sample standard deviation of 11 pounds. The confidence interval is calculated using the following formula:
Confidence Interval = (Mean - (1.96 x Standard Deviation/√n)), (Mean + (1.96 x Standard Deviation/√n))
Where n is the sample size.
Therefore, the 95% confidence interval for the population mean weight of newborn elephants is (231.14, 256.86).
This can also be represented in a graph. The graph would have the x-axis representing the confidence interval, with a range from 231.14 to 256.86, and the y-axis representing the probability, which would be 0.95.

For more questions on Standard Deviation

https://brainly.com/question/475676

#SPJ11

So the answer is 1.3 after rounding to 10.

The perimeter of the smaller triangle would be = 28.1

A triangle can be defined as a three sided polygon that has a total internal angle of 180°.

To calculate the perimeter of the triangle is to find out the scale factor that exists between the two triangles.

The formula for scale factor = original object/new object

Scale factor= 8/7 = 1.14

The perimeter of the smaller triangle = 32/1.14

= 28.1.

Learn more about perimeter here:

https://brainly.com/question/25092270

#SPJ1

$700. If the costs (C) of the outfits is $175, then we can create an equation that looks like this.

C x .25 = $175

To find C, taking the derivative of the equation by.25, and you get...

C = $700

By multiplying the value by the entire value and multiply that number by 100, the percentage may be calculated.

Sample percentages include:

10% is equal to 10/100, or 1/10 of the total.

20% is equal to 20/100, or 1/5 of the total.

30% is equal to 30/100, or 3/10 of the total.

40% is equal to 40/100, or 2/5 of the total.

50% is equal to 50/100, or half of the number.

To know more about Percentages click here .

brainly.com/question/29306119

#SPJ4

The closest estimate for the experimental probability of rolling a 4 on the cube is 0.116.

Probability is a metric used to determine how likely an event is to take place. Often, it is stated as a number between 0 and 1, with 0 denoting an impossibility and 1 denoting a certainty. With a typical six-sided dice, for instance, the likelihood of rolling a 1 is 1/6 or around 0.167.

Several techniques can be used to determine probability, depending on the circumstance. When rolling a fair die, for example, the likelihood of each potential result is equal and may be estimated using the formula:

Amount of favorable outcomes / Total number of potential outcomes is how you calculate an event's probability.

Given that, cube numbered from 1 through 6 is rolled 500 times.

The experimental probability of 4 landing face-up on the cube is:

Experimental probability = Number of times 4 lands face-up / Total number of rolls

Experimental probability = 58 / 500 = 0.116.

Hence, the closest estimate for the experimental probability of rolling a 4 on the cube is 0.116.

Learn more about experimental probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/27829466

#SPJ1

The vector equation and the parametric equations in t for the line through the point and parallel to the given line are:

x= 2t - 4

y= -4t + 7

z= 8t + 5

To find x, y, and z in the given scenario, the following steps can be followed:

1: Vector Equation of Line

To find the vector equation, use the given line and its coefficients:

x = -4 + 2t

y = 7 - 4t

z = 5 + 8t

Take the coefficients of x, y, and z, and place them in a 3 by 1 matrix:

Column Matrix= [-4 7 5]

Add the parameter t and place it in a column matrix to get the vector equation:

Vector Equation= [-4 7 5] + t[2 -4 8]

2: Parametric Equation.

To find the parametric equations, write the components of the vector equation in terms of the parameters:

x= -4 + 2t

y= 7 - 4t

z= 5 + 8t

Learn more about vector equation at

https://brainly.com/question/30561769

#SPJ11

Answer:

A. $12.45

Step-by-step explanation:

$20.00 - $7.55 = $12.45

In order to make the same amount of money, they would have to each sell 5 bicycles. They would both make $500

To find the number of bicycles they would need to sell to make the same amount of money,

We can set Jim's and Tom's weekly earnings equal to each other and solve for the number of bicycles:

250 + 50x = 400 + 20x

30x = 150

x = 5

So they would need to sell 5 bicycles to make the same amount of money.

To find out how much money they would make for selling 5 bicycles, we can substitute x = 5 into either equation.

Let's use Jim's equation:

250 + 50(5) = 500

So they would make $500 for selling 5 bicycles.

Read more about linear relation at

https://brainly.com/question/4074386

#SPJ1

Answer: y+y=7

Step-by-step explanation:

7 is as big as 2 y's therefore y+y would be equal to 7

Answer:

how are you in high school and cant solve this, its -4

Step-by-step explanation:

As we have prove that the triangle has ΔEAB is congruent to ΔFDC.

Next, we can use the fact that AC = DB to prove that ΔEAB and ΔFDC have a pair of congruent sides. Specifically, since AC = DB and AE is parallel to DF, we know that triangles ACD and BDF are congruent by the Side-Angle-Side (SAS) congruence theorem. Therefore, we can conclude that AD = BC and CD = BD.

Now we can use the congruent angles and sides to prove that the remaining sides and angles of ΔEAB and ΔFDC are congruent. Specifically, we know that ∠AEB is congruent to ∠FDC and ∠EAB is congruent to ∠FDC because of the angle congruence we established earlier.

Additionally, we know that AB is congruent to CD and AD is congruent to BC because of the side congruence we established earlier. Finally, we know that AC = DB because this was given in the problem statement.

By using these angle and side congruences, we have shown that ΔEAB and ΔFDC are congruent by the Side-Angle-Side (SAS) congruence theorem.

Therefore, we have proven that ΔEAB is congruent to ΔFDC.

To know more about triangle here

https://brainly.com/question/8587906

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

Given: ΔAEB and ΔDFC, ABCD, AE || DF, EB || FC, AC = DB

Prove: ΔEAB ≅ ΔFDC

Using the given percentages we can see that 150 people likes grapes.

To find this, we need to take the product between the percentage of people that likes grapes (in decimal form) and the total number of people surveyed.

To get the decimal form of the percentage we just need to divide it by 100%, we will get:

20%/100% = 0.2

And there were 750 people surveyed, then the total number of people that likes grapes is:

N = 750*0.2 = 150.

Learn more about percentages at.

https://brainly.com/question/843074

#SPJ1

Answer:

The graph is a dotted line from (  0, 12  ) to (  15  , 0 )

The shaded region is above the boundary line. The origin is not in the shaded region.

===================================================

Explanation:

x = number of shirts

y = number of pants

16x = amount made from the shirts only

20y = amount made from the pants only

16x+20y = total amount made, aka revenue

16x+20y > 240

This is because Giselle needs to make more than $240 to be profitable.

------------------

The graph is a dotted line because the "or equal to" is not part of the inequality sign. If Giselle could make $240 and be profitable, then we would use a solid line instead and use "or equal to". But in this case, she must make above $240.

Let's consider the boundary line 16x+20y = 240. Plug in x = 0 to get

16x+20y = 240

16*0+20y = 240

20y = 240

y = 240/20

y = 12

Therefore we can say (0,12) is one point on the dotted boundary line. It is the y intercept.

Use similar steps for y = 0 to find x.

16x+20y = 240

16x+20*0 = 240

16x = 240

x = 240/16

x = 15

The x intercept is (15,0) where the dotted line crosses the x axis.

Therefore, the dotted boundary line goes through (0,12) and (15,0).

------------------

Now to the question: where to shade?

Let's check the origin point (0,0). Meaning we plug in x = 0 and y = 0.

16x+20y > 240

16*0+20*0 > 240

0+0 > 240

0 > 240

Clearly that's false so (0,0) is NOT in the shaded solution region. We shade the opposite region of the origin. We'll shade above the boundary as indicated in the diagram below. I used GeoGebra to make the graph. Desmos is another good option.

Answer:

141.3m^2

Step-by-step explanation:

We have radius = 8

Area of a sector of circle = πr^2(θ/360º)

A = π x 8^2 x (270/360) = 48π

Smaller circle has radius equal to 1/4 of large circle's radius = 8/4 = 2

A = π x 2^2 x (270/360) = 3π

Area of the shape = 48π - 3π = 45π = 45(3.14) = 141.3m^2

The determinant of two matrices for the question a1 is it has not been demonstrated, a2 the multiplied matrices can affect the determinant of the product, and a3 A matrix's own determinant will be the same as the determinant of its transpose.

a1.) Conjecture about the relation between det(AB), and det(BA):

The determinant of the product of two matrices is not necessarily equal.

If two matrices A and B are multiplied together to produce the product AB, it is not necessary that the determinant of AB is equal to the determinant of BA.

This is a conjecture that has not yet been demonstrated in every case.%

a2.) Conjecture about the relation between det(AB), det(B), and det(A):

The following conjecture could be made about the relation between the determinants det(AB), det(B), and det(A):

det(AB) = det(BA) det(AB) = det(A)det(B)det(BA) = det(A)det(B)

These conjectures are not true in general.

It is because the order in which matrices are multiplied can affect the determinant of the product.%

a3.) Conjecture about the relation between det(A™), and det(A):

This conjecture about the relation between the determinants det(A™) and det(A) can be made:

det(A™) = det(A)

The transpose of a matrix does not alter the determinant, as long as the matrix is square.

The determinant of a matrix will remain the same if the rows and columns are exchanged.

Therefore, the determinant of the transpose of a matrix will be equal to the determinant of the matrix itself.

Learn more about matric here:

https://brainly.com/question/27731000

#SPJ11

the length of the other leg is 7m and the length of the hypotenuse is 7√2 m.

In the right-angled triangle, the square of the hypotenuse side is equals to the sum of the squares of the other two sides, according to Pythagoras's Theorem. This triangle's three sides are known as the Perpendicular, Base, and Hypotenuse. Because to its position opposite the 90° angle, the hypotenuse in this case is the longest side.

The definition yields the following as the Pythagoras Theorem formula:

Hypotenuse² = Perpendicular² + Base²

c² = a² + b²

Length of one leg=7m

Angles of triangle are 45°,45° and 90°

According to Pythagoras theorem,

x²=7²+7²

x=7√2

the length of the other leg is 7m and the length of the hypotenuse is 7√2 m.

To know more about triangle, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2773823

#SPJ1

It will take Eric 2.5 minutes to add 15 gallons of water to the pool and fill it to at least 27 gallons.

To fill the pool with at least 27 gallons of water, Eric needs to add:

27 - 12 = 15 gallons of water

The rate at which the water flows is 6 gallons per minute, so we can set up the equation:

6x = 15

where x is the number of minutes it will take for Eric to add 15 gallons of water to the pool.

Solving for x, we get:

x = 15/6

x = 2.5

This is the inequality that represents the situation because it shows that the amount of time Eric needs to add water to the pool must be greater than or equal to 15/6 minutes (or 2.5 minutes), which is the minimum time required to add 15 gallons of water.

The gallon has been in use since at least the 14th century and has undergone several changes in its size and definition over the centuries.  It is commonly used in the United States, United Kingdom, and other countries that use the imperial system of measurement. One gallon is equal to 3.785 liters, and it is divided into four quarts or eight pints. In the US, a gallon is often used to measure the volume of gasoline, milk, and other liquids.

The word "gallon" has its roots in the Old French word "galon," which meant "measure of liquid." In the US, there are two different types of gallons: the US gallon, which is based on the Winchester gallon used in the late 18th century, and the imperial gallon, which is used in the UK and other Commonwealth countries.

To learn more about Gallons visit here:

brainly.com/question/8368059

#SPJ4

In mathematical induction, prove that n lines separate the plane into (n^2 + n + 2)/2 regions if no two of these lines are parallel and no three pass through a common point.

Mathematical induction is a mathematical proof method that is used to demonstrate a statement or formula for all values of n, where n is a positive integer. If we use induction, we can show that the formula is true for n = 1, and we can also show that if the formula is true for n = k, then it is also true for n = k + 1.

Proof for n lines separating the plane into (n^2 + n + 2)/2 regions is given below:

Base Case: The theorem is true for n = 1. When we draw one line in the plane, we see that it splits the plane into two regions. Hence the formula is true for n = 1.

Induction Hypothesis: We believe that the formula is true for k lines. That is, k lines split the plane into (k^2 + k + 2)/2 regions.

Induction Step: We want to demonstrate that the formula is also true for k + 1 lines. We first take an arbitrary line from these k + 1 lines, which we call l. We notice that this line splits the plane into two regions.

Now, for the remaining k lines, we make an induction argument. We are sure that the formula is true for k lines. Thus, the k lines split the plane into (k^2 + k + 2)/2 regions. We know that these k lines intersect the line l at k points. Thus, by adding line l, we create k + 1 regions on the plane between these lines.

We now consider the line l itself. It can't cross any of the other k lines, or it would not meet our requirements. Therefore, it crosses each of the k existing lines, generating k + 1 areas. Thus, with the inclusion of line l, the number of regions on the plane is (k^2 + k + 2)/2 + k + 1 = (k^2 + 3k + 4)/2.

The formula for k + 1 is (k + 1)^2 + (k + 1) + 2 = k^2 + 3k + 4, and it is thus identical to the formula for the number of regions when k lines are drawn on the plane.

Therefore, the statement is true for all positive integers n.

Therefore, we have proved that n lines separate the plane into (n^2 + n + 2)/2 regions if no two of these lines are parallel and no three pass through a common point, by using mathematical induction.

To know more about "mathematical induction": https://brainly.com/question/29503103

#SPJ11

If all other factors are held constant, then the true parameter is farther from the value of the null hypothesis which is an increase in the probability of a Type II error.The correct option is A.

The true parameter is farther from the value of the null hypothesis.

When the true parameter is farther away from the value of the null hypothesis, it increases the probability of a Type II error. This is because the null hypothesis will have a harder time rejecting the true parameter.

The other factors - increasing sample size, decreasing significance level, and decreasing standard error - all result in a decreased probability of a Type II error.

To learn more about the null hypothesis:

https://brainly.com/question/15980493

#SPJ11

Let X and Y be two matrices in A. We can write X = ((x,0),(0,y)) and Y = ((z,0),(0,w)). If we add X and Y, we get((x+z,0),(0,y+w)). The sum is in A if and only if x+z+y+w=5.

Subset of M2x2:A subset of M2x2 is a set that contains some elements of M2x2.

A subset of M2x2 can be considered as a subspace if it meets the following conditions:

To determine if A is a subspace of M2x2, we need to verify that A meets the following conditions:

for such more questions on subset matrices

https://brainly.com/question/18372058

#SPJ11

Lee buys 12 notebooks and the cost of each one is $1.29. The total cost of all twenty notebooks is equals to $15.48. So, Total $15.48, money lee spends on the 12 notebooks.

We have, Lee buys some notebooks by spending money.

Number of notebooks that she bought = 12

The price or cost of one notebook = $1.29

We have to determine the amount of money she spends on the 12 notebooks, that total cost of 12 notebooks. Let the total cost of 12 notebooks be 'x dollars'. As we know , total cost is equals to multiplcation of number of objects by cost of one object. So, total cost of 12 notebooks = number of notebooks × cost of one notebook

=> total cost of 12 notebooks = 12 ×1.29

= (12×129)/100

= 15.48

Hence, the required cost is $15.48.

For more information about multiplcation, visit :

https://brainly.com/question/28773316

#SPJ4

Complete question:

Lee buys 12 notebooks for $1.29 each. How much money does lee spend on the 12 notebooks.

Answer:

400(3)^3

Step-by-step explanation:

It tripled for 3 hours which is 3^3 and there's 400 bacteria

1.5b + 0.75b represents the total amount of nuts and dried fruit used for b bags of snack mix.

b is the number of bags of snack mix, so the expression 1.5b means 1.5 multiplied by b, which is the total amount of nuts used for b bags of snack mix. Similarly, 0.75b is 0.75 multiplied by b, which is the total amount of dried fruit used for b bags of snack mix.

Adding these together gives us 1.5b + 0.75b, which is the total amount of nuts and dried fruit used for b bags of snack mix.

If the school has population of 2,462, then approximately 1,784 students at the school wore their school shirt on Friday.

If 19 out of 26 students wore their school shirt on Friday, then the fraction of students who wore their school shirt is:

[tex]\frac{19}{26}[/tex]

We can use this fraction to estimate the number of students who wore their school shirt on Friday. If there are approximately 2,462 students in the school, then the estimated number of students who wore their school shirt on Friday is:

[tex](\frac{19}{26}) * 2,462 = 1,783.69[/tex]

Rounding this to the nearest whole number, we get an estimate of 1,784 students who wore their school shirt on Friday.

Learn more about fraction

brainly.com/question/10354322

#SPJ4

16. The equatiοn οf the line in slοpe-intercept fοrm that passes thrοugh the pοint (-6, 5) and is parallel tο x + 2y = 14 is y = (-1/2)x + 2.

The equatiοn οf a straight line is y = mx + c, y = m x + c m is the gradient and c is the height at which the line crοsses the y -axis, alsο knοwn as the y -intercept.

16. Tο write the equatiοn οf a line in slοpe-intercept fοrm, we need tο find the slοpe and the y-intercept οf the line.

Tο find the slοpe οf the line, we can rewrite the equatiοn x + 2y = 14 in slοpe-intercept fοrm y = mx + b by sοlving fοr y:

x + 2y = 14

2y = -x + 14

y = (-1/2)x + 7

The slοpe οf the line is -1/2.

Since the line we want tο find is parallel tο this line, it will have the same slοpe οf -1/2.

Nοw we can use the pοint-slοpe fοrm οf the equatiοn οf a line tο find the equatiοn οf the line that passes thrοugh the pοint (-6, 5) with a slοpe οf -1/2:

y - y1 = m(x - x1)

where (x1, y1) is the pοint (-6, 5), and m is the slοpe, -1/2.

y - 5 = (-1/2)(x - (-6))

y - 5 = (-1/2)x - 3

y = (-1/2)x + 2

17. The equation perpendicular to y = -(2/3)x + 4, passing through (-4, 6)

perpendicular equations slope would be negative reciprocal to the current line.

The slope in y = -(2/3)x + 4, is m = -(2/3),

The negative reciprocal of -(2/3) is 3/2

Now, applying the x and y values in pοint-slοpe fοrm

y - 6 = 3/2(x - (-4))

y =  3/2(x+4) + 6

y =  (3/2)x + 6 + 6

y =  (3/2)x + 12

18. Since the line we want tο find is parallel tο this line, it will have the same slοpe.

Lets find the slope using slope formula

[tex]\rm m = \dfrac{y_2 - y_1}{x_2 - x_1}[/tex]

[tex]\rm m = \dfrac{0 - (-1)}{2 - (-1)}[/tex]

[tex]\rm m = \dfrac{1}{3}[/tex]

Now, using the point slope form

y - 1 = 1/3(x - 3)

y = 1/3(x - 3) + 1

y = (1/3)x - 1 + 1

y = (1/3)x

Learn more about equation of line on:

https://brainly.com/question/18831322

#SPJ1