8. How might someone choose to "balance a ticket?"

Answer:

Medieval Muslims made many important innovations and adaptations in various fields such as science, mathematics, architecture, art, and literature. Some of the most notable innovations and adaptations of medieval Muslims are:

Algebra: The word algebra comes from the Arabic word "al-jabr," which means "reunion of broken parts." Medieval Muslim mathematicians, such as Al-Khwarizmi and Al-Karaji, made significant contributions to the development of algebra and introduced many new concepts such as quadratic equations, algebraic expressions, and equations with two or more unknowns.

Astronomy: Medieval Muslim astronomers made important observations and discoveries in the field of astronomy. They developed new techniques for measuring the position and movement of celestial bodies and created elaborate astronomical instruments such as astrolabes and celestial globes.

Medicine: Medieval Muslim physicians, such as Ibn Sina (Avicenna) and Al-Razi (Rhazes), made significant contributions to the development of medical science. They wrote important medical texts that were translated into Latin and influenced the development of medicine in Europe.

Architecture: Medieval Muslim architects developed new techniques for constructing large and complex buildings. They created intricate geometric designs and used innovative building materials such as colored tiles, glazed ceramics, and stucco plaster.

Literature: Medieval Muslim writers made significant contributions to the development of literature. They wrote epic poetry, romantic tales, and philosophical treatises that influenced later writers in Europe and Asia.

Calligraphy: Medieval Muslim calligraphers developed a highly refined and stylized form of calligraphy. They used complex geometric designs and intricate patterns to create beautiful works of art.

Overall, medieval Muslims made many important innovations and adaptations that have had a lasting impact on the world. Their contributions helped to shape the modern world in many ways and continue to inspire new ideas and discoveries.

False. According to the  Documents 2 and 3, the Nazis were not intentionally starving residents of the ghettos.

Document 2 states that the residents were only given 180 grams of bread a day and 220 grams of sugar a month, which does not cover 10% of their nutritional requirements. Document 3 states that the Nazis had put up a wall around the ghetto hermetically sealed, with barbed wire and broken glass, to not allow in any food. This indicates that the Nazis were not intentionally starving the residents, as they had put measures in place to prevent food from entering.

For such more questions on Nazis :

brainly.com/question/1167256

#SPJ11

Answer:

C. upsetting the balance between free and slave states.

Explanation:

Prisoners were treated poorly in both situations.

Answer:

A. *politics for the "common man."

The importance of Jacksonian democracy lies in all of its deep contradictions. It managed to be both democratic and anti-democratic at the same time. Which is largely why it has not been a valued governance model since the beginning of it’s end, with the Civil War. The more perduring positive legacy of it would be civic engagement in campaigns, at least; and to a lesser extent, state and local processes and policies. There were serious negative legacies it left, as well.

The high-level theory of Jacksonianism implies a government by, for and of the people. Versus and in contrast to: a government led by aristocracy, oligarchy, elitism, etc. Jackson believed less power in the hands of the latter would insure less corruption, and, more, well, ‘we the people’ -style democracy. It was much about a rejection of the one-(First) party Thomas Jefferson administration that largely limited political power to a limited cohort of East Coast elites. The Jacksonian ‘Second Party’ System sought to break the mold and intentionally engage the ‘common man.’

Most of us learn that democracy is about the fair and equal rights and inputs of all—including, ostensibly, the populist (simply: non-government employed population). The reality was (and remains) that democracies—from the Roman Empire to the British Empire (as well as to many American administrations from both parties, including the current Trump Administration)—often were anything but, in practice, solely or even primarily: ‘for the people.’

From this perspective Jackson’s iteration of democracy was radical—but, only to a point. He wasn’t an extremist. With the most unmistakable evidence he wasn’t being that Jackson—and the whole concept of Jacksonian democracy, was, in truth, a poor model for political equality and equitable power.

Blame it on the times if you like, but, the fact is that by ‘the people’ Jackson really meant only ‘white men.’ All others—Native Americans, Mexicans, blacks, women, etc., were left out in theory and ideology (though some unspoken). and especially in policy and practice—to the point that his Congress had a gag rule against discussion of slave policy.

Beyond those glaringly incongruent exceptions, Jackson was considered a ‘new federalist’ due to his straddle of the federalist system as well as some parts of the anti-federalist paradigms. He was a fan of short term limits, protective of states rights and promoted individual rights. The catch is he also managed to expand the executive/president’s office, reduce the potency of the legislature/Congress, all but failed at ‘draining the swamp’ (other than of his political foes who he hastened to remove in wide swaths and whom he replaced with supporters), endorsed slavery, and pulled in the federal reigns over states during the nullification crisis.

Beyond this all, is a theme abundantly demonstrated in the Donald J. Trump presidency. Jackson was a fan of patronage—appointing your friends and allies to political positions—and, (though it’s unknown if Trump will follow through with this part of it): rotating new ones in after four years, apparently to keep the system fresh.

Keeping this relevant background and context in mind, here are some key features of the Jacksonian doctrine, largely in theory again, not necessarily practice—-

Suffrage/Voting rights

Rhetorically Jackson elevated and espoused the concept of ‘majority’ rule. Towards that end one notable battle he took on was an attempt at the abolishment of the Electoral College, part of representative democracy, with their party-appointed representatives (elector(s)) for each state serving as proxies of sort for ‘the people’s’ presidential vote. Jackson felt the electors and Electoral College process was incongruent with the ‘one (white) man, one vote,’ process of the popular vote/majority rule system.

Manifest Destiny

Jackson wanted to ‘expand freedom’ geographically. This was related to both his agrarian ideals—which he boosted with supporting the distribution of land to individual citizens—and, also to the destruction of first nation Native American tribes, an anti-freedom (for non-whites) policy which led to the Indian Removal Act and the Trail of Tears, both under his watch.

In the spirit of the entitlement ethos known as American exceptionalism (or, more literally: ‘Romantic’ nationalism), Jackson was a proponent of both (white) citizens and the government exploring and taking control of the of the American frontier, beyond the colonized East. The ‘destiny’ part comes from the belief that this was settlers’ God-given right. As though God Him/Herself gave white (male) citizens of the U.S. more favor than the land’s indigenous citizens to the North, West and South.

The pace of settlement of the Old Northwest (Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, ...) was determined primarily by the prices of public lands.

What is the Old Northwest?

The Old Northwest is the region in the United States bounded by the Great Lakes to the north, the Mississippi River to the west, and the Ohio River to the south, which was acquired by the United States in the Treaty of Paris that ended the American Revolutionary War in 1783.

The settlement of the Old Northwest began in earnest in the late 18th century after the American Revolution and continued into the early 19th century.

What determined the pace of settlement of the Old Northwest?

The prices of public lands, which were set by the federal government, were the primary determinant of the pace of settlement of the Old Northwest. The government sold large tracts of land in the Old Northwest to settlers and speculators, and the prices of these lands fluctuated depending on supply and demand.

When the prices were high, settlement slowed, and when they were low, settlement increased. Land speculation, the construction of canals and roads, and the availability of credit also played a role in determining the pace of settlement of the Old Northwest.

Learn more about Old Northwest here:

brainly.com/question/29038507

#SPJ11

Answer:

5. How do you think most Cherokee reacted upon getting this message?

Please help me

Explanation:

To answer this question, it would be helpful to know what message you are referring to. If you could provide more information or context, I would be happy to provide a response.

Tatum O'Neal is the youngest person ever to win an Academy Award. At the age of 10, she won the Best Supporting Actress award in 1974 for her role in the movie "Paper Moon." She played the role of Addie Loggins, the daughter of a con artist who becomes a father figure to her after her mother's death.

"Paper Moon" was directed by Peter Bogdanovich and starred Tatum O'Neal's father, Ryan O'Neal, in the lead role. Tatum O'Neal's performance in the film was widely praised and she became the youngest person ever to win an Academy Award, a record she still holds to this day. Tatum O'Neal had a promising start to her career, but she struggled with addiction and personal problems as she got older.

She has made occasional appearances in movies and television shows over the years, but she is perhaps best known for her role in "Paper Moon" and for her record-breaking achievement as the youngest Academy Award winner.

For more such questions on Academy Award

https://brainly.com/question/14879214

#SPJ11

European imperialism had a significant effect on sub-Saharan African cultures in the late 1800s. The following are some of the ways that European imperialism impacted sub-Saharan African cultures in the late 1800s:It destroyed traditional cultures and social systems: European imperialism resulted in the forced imposition of European cultures, laws, and religions on the Africans.

This resulted in the loss of many of the Africans' traditional cultures and social systems. The majority of the Africans were forced to adopt Christianity and abandon their traditional religious beliefs. Economic Impact: The colonial powers developed African economies, but only in ways that benefitted themselves, not the indigenous population. Africans were forced to work in mines and on plantations, while Europeans owned the businesses and derived the profits. This resulted in a significant decline in the standard of living for many Africans.

The spread of diseases: European colonizers brought with them diseases that the Africans had never seen before, such as smallpox and measles. As a result, there were a lot of deaths and the decimation of local cultures. The Europeans had built large hospitals and quarantine stations, which helped the Europeans, but the Africans had no such resources. The spread of education: On the other hand, education was another impact that the Europeans had on sub-Saharan African cultures.

Missionaries and colonizers built schools and promoted education, which helped many Africans to learn new things and gain new skills. Africans were able to communicate with each other more easily because they could read and write. They were also able to understand more about the world and different cultures.

For more such questions on European imperialism

https://brainly.com/question/13600608

#SPJ11

Based on the discussions regarding the mass wasting events in La Conchita, California, and Oso, Washington, the following statement most accurately describes these situations: Both of these incidents were due to geological issues that caused the destabilization of soil and rocks.

The mass wasting events in La Conchita, California, and Oso, Washington, occurred due to geological issues that caused the destabilization of soil and rocks. Both of these incidents were a result of the same geological phenomenon, which is the movement of soil and rocks downhill due to gravity.

La Conchita in California is particularly prone to landslides because of the region's steep slopes and unstable soil. In March of 2014, a large landslide occurred in Oso, Washington, killing over 40 people.

Mass wasting refers to the downslope movement of soil and rock due to gravity. Mass wasting events are generally caused by water, wind, or geological forces, and they are particularly prevalent in regions with steep slopes, unstable soil, or a combination of the two. Landslides, rockslides, and mudslides are examples of mass wasting events.

To know more about  mass wasting refer here

https://brainly.com/question/17071531#

#SPJ11

Answer:

- Most importantly, Article 231 of the treaty, better known as the “war guilt clause,” forced Germany to accept full responsibility for starting World War I and pay enormous reparations for Allied war losses.

- By placing the burden of war guilt entirely on Germany, imposing harsh reparations payments and creating an increasingly unstable collection of smaller nations in Europe, the treaty would ultimately fail to resolve the underlying issues that caused war to break out in 1914, and help pave the way for another massive global conflict 20 years later.

Answer:

Explanation:

a war that is unrestricted in terms of the weapons used, the territory or combatants involved, or the objectives pursued, especially one in which the laws of war are disregarded.

Industrial discharge, nuclear waste, and medical waste are the three most significant sources of pollution to the Chang jiang in china .

Option b is correct .

The Yangtze River's (Chang Jiang) Pollution Source One of the most polluted rivers in the world is the Yangtze. Industrial trash, which includes chemicals and other waste products from manufacturers, is the main cause of pollution on this river.

Any trash containing infectious pathogens created during the care of people or animals, as well as during the use of biologics in research, is referred to as biomedical waste or hospital waste.

No matter where it came from, this hazardous trash contains extremely dangerous substances like pellets of plutonium and uranium. These extremely radioactive substances continue to be highly harmful for tens of thousands of years, endangering people, freshwater sources, agricultural land, and fisheries.

Hence , Option b is correct .

To know more about Industrial discharge visit :

https://brainly.com/question/30647947

#SPJ4

C. Kansas-Nebraska Act.

One of the most major movements focused at eliminating economic disparity is socialism.Abolitionism and economic ideology known as and distribution of commodities and services by a group inequality formed

Inequality refers to the unequal distribution of resources, wealth, and opportunities among individuals or groups in a community. Economic inequality, social inequality, and political inequality are just a few of the ways it can appear. Economic inequality refers to income and wealth gaps, when some people or groups vastly outpace others in terms of resources. The term "social inequality" describes uneven opportunities and treatment based on traits like race, gender, sexual orientation, or religion. Political representation and power access differences are referred to as political inequality. Inequality may have far-reaching implications, including higher poverty, less social mobility, and diminished economic growth. A complex strategy that incorporates

Learn more about inequality here:

https://brainly.com/question/30231190

#SPJ4

Statements that specifically describe the communist movement in America are a. Popular Front and its focus on civil liberties helped to create understanding of Americanism. b. The Communist Party sought to ally themselves with socialists

The first statement, that the Popular Front and its focus on civil liberties helped to create a more pluralistic understanding of Americanism," alludes to a political tactic used by the Communist Party USA in the middle of the 1930s in order to advance their political goals by forming alliances with other progressive organisations. The Communist Party stressed its support for civil freedoms as part of this policy, which contributed to the development of a more varied and inclusive conception of American nationality.

The second statement, that during the Popular Front, the Communist Party tried to align itself with socialists and New Dealers," similarly captures the Communist Party's efforts to join forces with other progressive organisations at this time. To further their common objectives of economic justice and social reform, the Communist Party in particular wanted to cooperate with socialists and New Dealers.

Complete Question:

In the mid-1930s, for the first time in American history, the left-an umbrella term for socialists, communists, labor radicals, and many New Deal liberals-enjoyed a shaping influence on the nation's politics and culture. Identify the statements that specifically describe the communist movement in America.

a. The Popular Front and its focus on civil liberties helped to create a more pluralistic understanding of Americanism.

b. The Communist Party sought to ally themselves with socialists and New Dealers during the time of the Popular Front.

c. It prominently features African-Americans, thus demonstrating the Communist Party's commitment to supporting people of all races.

d. It depicts working Americans united under the American and Communist flags, emphasizing the Americanization of the movement.

Read more about the communist movement on:

https://brainly.com/question/26114336

#SPJ4

Answer:

. How do you think Cherokee Chief John Ross responded upon receiving this address? What options were available to him?

Explanation:

It is difficult to know for certain how Cherokee Chief John Ross responded upon receiving the address without knowing more specifics about the address in question. However, based on historical context, it is likely that he would have responded with a mixture of frustration, anger, and sadness.

During the mid-1800s, the United States government implemented a policy of Indian removal, which sought to forcibly relocate Native American tribes from their ancestral lands to reservations in other parts of the country. The Cherokee Nation, of which John Ross was the principal chief, was one of the tribes affected by this policy. In 1838, the U.S. government forcibly removed the Cherokee people from their land in what became known as the Trail of Tears.

Given this context, it is likely that any address received by John Ross from the U.S. government would have been seen as an attempt to further erode the sovereignty and autonomy of the Cherokee Nation. Options available to John Ross would have been limited, as the U.S. government had significant military and political power at the time. He could have chosen to resist the government's policies through legal means, such as appealing to the Supreme Court, as the Cherokee Nation had done in previous cases. However, given the history of forced removal and violence against Native American tribes, it is understandable that Ross and other Cherokee leaders would have been skeptical of the U.S. legal system. Alternatively, Ross could have sought to negotiate with the U.S. government for more favorable terms. However, given the power imbalance between the two parties, such negotiations may not have been successful. Ultimately, the options available to John Ross and the Cherokee Nation would have been limited by the larger historical and political context of the time.

Answer:

Primo de Rivera's government achieved some successes in terms of stabilizing the political situation, modernizing the economy, and implementing social reforms, but it also faced significant challenges and ultimately failed to address the underlying problems that had led to political instability and social unrest in the first place. The government's authoritarianism, corruption, and failure to address the root causes of the country's problems ultimately led to its downfall.

Explanation:

Primo de Rivera was a Spanish general who led a military coup in 1923 and established a dictatorship that lasted until 1930. During his rule, Primo de Rivera implemented a series of policies aimed at modernizing the country and stabilizing the political situation, but his government also faced significant challenges and ultimately failed to achieve its objectives. Here are some of the successes and failures of Primo de Rivera's government between 1923 and 1930:

Successes:

Stabilization of the political situation: Primo de Rivera's government managed to restore order and stability to a country that had been plagued by political instability, social unrest, and regional conflicts. The dictatorship suspended political parties, suppressed strikes and demonstrations, and imposed strict censorship, which helped to reduce political violence and restore public order.

Modernization of the economy: Primo de Rivera's government launched a series of economic reforms aimed at modernizing the country's infrastructure and boosting industrialization. The government invested heavily in public works, such as roads, bridges, and ports, and encouraged foreign investment to stimulate economic growth.

Social reforms: Primo de Rivera's government implemented a series of social reforms aimed at improving the living conditions of the working class. The government introduced measures to improve housing conditions, health care, and education, and established a minimum wage and a maximum working day.

Failures:

Authoritarianism: Primo de Rivera's government was characterized by authoritarianism, with the regime suppressing civil liberties, limiting freedom of the press and assembly, and controlling all aspects of political and social life. This led to widespread discontent and opposition to the regime, especially among liberal and progressive groups.

Corruption: Primo de Rivera's government was plagued by corruption, with many officials abusing their power for personal gain. The regime also granted concessions and favors to its supporters, leading to a growing sense of injustice and inequality among the population.

Failure to address underlying problems: Despite the government's efforts to modernize the country, it failed to address the underlying problems that had led to political instability and social unrest in the first place. The government's reforms were largely superficial and did not address the root causes of the country's problems, such as inequality, poverty, and corruption.

Many canals were built in the darker-shaded states in order to connect C. natural waterways.

Canals were an important mode of transportation in the United States during the 19th century. They were built to connect natural waterways, such as rivers and lakes, and allowed for goods to be transported over longer distances than was possible with river transportation alone. Canals were particularly important for the transportation of heavy goods, such as coal and iron, which were essential for the growth of industry during this time period.

Many canals were built in the darker-shaded states in the map of the United States during the 19th century, including the Erie Canal in New York, the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal in Maryland and Virginia, and the Miami and Erie Canal in Ohio. These canals played a critical role in the economic development of the regions through which they passed, and helped to facilitate the growth of trade and commerce in the United States.

To learn more about canals refer to:

brainly.com/question/27265758

#SPJ4

After the end of World War I, the German sphere of influence in China was given to Japan.

The German sphere of influence in China was made up of the Shandong Province and other territories in northern China. Japan fought on the side of the Allies during World War I and was given the right to manage these territories in northern China at the Treaty of Versailles. This infuriated the Chinese, and there were protests all over the country. They were already angry because they had been promised at the Treaty of Versailles that they would regain control of their own country, but Japan's occupation of northern China was seen as an infringement of their sovereignty.

This statement is backed up by answer B

learn more about  World War I here:

https://brainly.com/question/25049423

#SPJ11

Option-C: Serious ethical violations by corporations such as Enron led to the passage of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (also known as SOX) was passed in 2002 in response to the corporate accounting scandals involving Enron, WorldCom and other companies. SOX aims to protect investors from fraudulent accounting activities and provide better protection to whistleblowers. The law covers publicly traded companies and requires them to establish rigorous internal controls, maintain accurate financial records, and increase financial transparency.

It also outlaws insider trading and imposes strict penalties on executives found guilty of corporate fraud. SOX requires companies to provide accurate and complete financial reports that are monitored by an independent audit. SOX also established the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board to provide oversight over accounting firms and their audits. The law is widely seen as successful in increasing the accountability of corporate executives and increasing the reliability of corporate financial statements.Thus,the correct answer is option-C.

For such more questions on ethical violations:

brainly.com/question/8965384

#SPJ11

Answer:

Spain was able to establish colonies in large areas of both continents.

Explanation:

Answer:

Sometimes parents and grandparents like to recount how difficult life was when they were kids, such as having to walk 10+ miles to school (in the snow, uphill both ways). A random sample of 180 teenagers were selected and 40% had heard stories from their parents or grandparents about how difficult life was when they were kids. Do these data provide convincing evidence at an α = 0.05 significance level that the proportion of all teenagers who have heard stories from their parents or grandparents about how difficult life was when they were kids differs from 0.50? State: Plan: Do: Conclude:

Explanation:

We want to test if the proportion of all teenagers who have heard stories from their parents or grandparents about how difficult life was when they were kids differs from 0.50.

The significance level is α = 0.05.

The sample size is n = 180 and the proportion of the sample who have heard stories is p = 0.40.

Plan:

We will use a one-sample proportion test.

The null hypothesis is that the true proportion, p, is equal to 0.50.

The alternative hypothesis is that the true proportion, p, is not equal to 0.50.

We will use a significance level of α = 0.05.

Do:

The test statistic is z = (p - P) / sqrt(P * (1 - P) / n), where P is the hypothesized proportion under the null hypothesis.

The observed test statistic is z = (0.40 - 0.50) / sqrt(0.50 * (1 - 0.50) / 180) = -2.47 (rounded to two decimal places).

The p-value is P(Z ≤ -2.47) + P(Z ≥ 2.47) = 2 * P(Z ≤ -2.47) = 0.013 (rounded to three decimal places), where Z is the standard normal distribution.

Since the p-value is less than the significance level of α = 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis.

Conclude:

There is convincing evidence at an α = 0.05 significance level that the proportion of all teenagers who have heard stories from their parents or grandparents about how difficult life was when they were kids differs from 0.50.

Specifically, the sample proportion of 0.40 suggests that the proportion may be lower than 0.50.

We want to test if the proportion of all teenagers who have heard stories from their parents or grandparents about how difficult life was when they were kids differs from 0.50. The significance level is a 0.05.

The sample size is n 180 and the proportion of the sample who have heard stories is p=0.40. Plan: We will use a one-sample proportion test. The null hypothesis is that the true proportion, p, is equal to 0.50. The alternative hypothesis is that the true proportion, p. is not equal to 0.50 We will use a significance level of a=0.05.

Do: The test statistic is z=(p-P)/sqrt(P(1-P)/n), where P is the hypothesized proportion under the null hypothesis. The observed test statistic is z = (0.40-0.50)/sqrt(0.50 (1-0.50)/180) = -2.47 (rounded to two decimal places). The p-value is P(Z<-247) + P(Z ≥2.47)-2 PZ ≤ 2.47) 0.013 (rounded to three decimal places), where Z is the standard normal distribution. Since the p-value is less than the significance level of a=0.05, we reject the null hypothesis. Conclude: There is convincing evidence at an a = 0.05 significance level that the proportion of all teenagers who have heard stories from their parents or grandparents about how difficult life was when they were kids differs from 0.50.

Specifically, the sample proportion of 0.40 suggests that the proportion may be lower than 0.50.

Learn more about level, here:

https://brainly.com/question/13947717

#SPJ2

President Herbert Hoover believed that the Great Depression could be ended by doing all of the following except lending federal funds to feed farm livestock.Keeping faith in the efficiency of the industrial system, directly assisting businesses and banks were some of his initiatives to end the great depression.

What was the Great Depression?The Great Depression was a severe worldwide economic depression that lasted from 1929 to 1939. The depression began in the United States of America after the stock market crashed on October 24, 1929. Following the crash, the stock prices fell significantly, and many people were left with enormous debts that they could not repay.What were the initiatives taken by President Hoover to end the Great Depression?President Hoover tried to end the Great Depression by taking several initiatives. Some of these initiatives are as follows:Keeping faith in the efficiency of the industrial system, i.e., the Hoover administration believed that the economy would naturally right itself after a period of correction.Directly assisting businesses and banks- Hoover signed the Hawley-Smoot Tariff in June 1930 to protect American manufacturers and farmers from foreign competition. He also supported a series of measures that would provide relief to the banking industry.Lending federal funds- President Hoover authorized the Reconstruction Finance Corporation (RFC) to give financial assistance to state and local governments, as well as to banks and other businesses.The only initiative that President Herbert Hoover didn't believe would help end the Great Depression was lending federal funds to feed farm livestock.

for  more questions on  Great Depression

https://brainly.com/question/441267

#SPJ11

In the 1930s, Japanese nationalists sought to correct the ill effects of the Great Depression by seizing foreign territories with valuable resources.

During the Great Depression, Japan faced significant economic challenges, including a decrease in exports and a rise in unemployment. To address these issues, Japanese nationalists believed that the country needed to expand its access to resources and markets, which could be achieved through territorial expansion.

In the early 1930s, Japan began to pursue an aggressive foreign policy, which included the invasion and occupation of Manchuria in 1931 and the subsequent establishment of the puppet state of Manchukuo. This was followed by Japan's invasion of China in 1937, which marked the beginning of the Second Sino-Japanese War. These actions were driven in part by a desire to secure access to natural resources and markets in China and other parts of Asia.

Overall, the Japanese nationalists sought to address the economic challenges of the Great Depression by expanding Japan's access to resources and markets through territorial expansion, rather than by negotiating trade agreements, expanding democratic principles, or adopting free-market capitalism.

To learn more about nationalists refer to:

brainly.com/question/15602794

#SPJ4

In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), the Marshall Court defined the Indian tribes as sovereign entities in much the same way that Georgia was.

Here is a brief summary of the case.Worcester v. Georgia (1832) is a significant decision made by the U.S. Supreme Court in which it was decided that Cherokee Indian nation had the right to declare themselves a separate, independent nation.

Georgia was outraged by this ruling and ignored the decision by the Supreme Court. Georgia passed legislation that outlawed the Cherokee Nation and placed its citizens under the jurisdiction of the state.

By ignoring the Supreme Court's decision, Georgia had blatantly disregarded the Constitution's supremacy clause, which holds that federal law supersedes state law when the two conflict.

The Supreme Court recognized that Georgia's actions had no legal authority and declared that the Cherokee Nation was a "distinct community" of people, capable of self-governance. In the opinion, the court defined the Indian tribes as sovereign entities in much the same way that Georgia was.

The decision was unanimous, with Chief Justice John Marshall writing the majority opinion. The court declared that the Cherokee Nation was an independent nation within the United States and had the right to make treaties with other countries.

The case marked the beginning of the federal government's policy of Indian removal, which led to the forced relocation of tens of thousands of Indians from the southeastern United States to Indian Territory (present-day Oklahoma).

TO KNOW ABOUT Worcester v:

https://brainly.com/question/22800339

#SPJ11

President Franklin Pierce  was the only eligible incumbent u.s. president not to be his party nomination for a second term.  It had been widely expected that no important competitor would have the necessary majority, and that the election would end in a deadlock.

Democrats were divided over the issue of slavery as the presidential election neared. President Franklin Pierce had support in his particular region and territory, but struggled to be chosen because he had been out of power for an extensive period and didn't have the support of the entire country. Significant damage was done to Franklin Pierce's reputation with many North the Democrats by his backing for the slave trade in the South.

Learn more on   president

brainly.com/question/20211357

#SPJ4

Answer:

I'm sorry, but I cannot provide a specific response without a passage or context to refer to. Please provide more information or context to help me understand the passage you are referring to.

Explanation:

He thinks there would be a Muslim-Hindu rebellion if all English troops were to withdraw from Indian land, which is used as an illustration of European colonialism in the chapter.

According to the passage in the chapter that discusses European colonization, if the entire English army were to leave Indian territory, there would be an uprising between Muslims and Hindus and chaos would reign throughout the entire nation.

It is clear how much power the British government today wields through the effect they have on Indian politics and economics.

Despite the fact that the country is home to a diverse range of religions, traditions, and customs, Ahmad Khan is outraged and disgusted by the way the administration handles and treats the public.

Learn more about European colonization: https://brainly.com/question/30900919

#SPJ1

The complete question is:

In your response, be sure to address all parts of the question. Use complete sentences, an outline or bulleted list alone is not acceptable.

Use the passage below to answer all parts of the question that follows.

"Now, suppose that all the English and the whole English army were to leave India, taking with them all their cannon and their splendid weapons and everything, then who would be rulers of India? Is it possible

that under these circumstances two nations--the Muslims and the Hindus-could sit on the same throne and remain equal in power? Most certainly not.

The aims and objects of the Indian National Congress are based upon an ignorance of history and present-day realities, they do not take into consideration that India is inhabited by different nationalities, they

presuppose that the various religions, castes, and ethnic groups of India can all be treated alike and all of them belong to the same nation. For the successful running of a democratic government, it is essential

that the majority should have the ability to govern not only themselves but also unwilling minorities. I consider the experiment that the Indian National Congress wants to make fraught with dangers and

suffering for all the nationalities of India, but especially for the Muslims. The Congress cannot rationally prove its claim to represent the opinions, ideals, and aspirations of the Muslims."

Syed Ahmad Khan, Indian Muslim educator and political reformer, speech given before the Muslim community of Meerut in northern India, 1888

a) Explain ONE way that the passage illustrates a response to European colonialism

Softball was nationally recognized as an official sport in the United States in 1933, with the founding of the Amateur Softball Association (ASA). Since then, it has become its own international governing body.

Softball was nationally recognized as an official sport in 1933, when the Amateur Softball Association (ASA) was founded in the United States. The ASA was established to oversee and promote the sport of softball and has since become one of the largest sports organizations in the country. Softball has since become a popular sport worldwide, with its own international governing body, the World Baseball Softball Confederation.

Learn more Softball here: brainly.com/question/20712712

#SPJ4

True Humans are more closely connected to chimpanzees and bonobos than to gorillas, according to the cladistic theory.

Since the chimpanzee genome was sequenced in 2005, scientists have known that chimpanzees are our closest living cousins because we share 99% of our DNA with them.

The cladistic approach to primate taxonomy is based on the use of morphological and genetic evidence to establish ancestral relationships. The following combination of traits is exclusively seen in primates (including humans), making them unique among all other species. an enormous, complex brain. depth perception is made possible by eyes that are forward-looking and have overlapping fields of vision.

To know more about chimpanzees  visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/9470154

#SPJ1